Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 8

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 17122626)

1.

Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery.

Rogers SO Jr, Wolf RE, Zaslavsky AM, Wright WE, Ayanian JZ.

Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):1003-11.

2.

Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.

Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jørgensen P, Iversen LH.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;3:CD005391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005391.pub3. Review.

PMID:
22419309
3.

[The efficacy of the multidisciplinary approach in colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients].

Tsar'kov PV, Nikoda VV, Stamov VI, Markar'ian DR, Tulina IA.

Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2012;(2):4-13. Review. Russian.

PMID:
22678468
4.

Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome.

Iversen LH, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jørgensen P; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group.

Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jan;9(1):38-46. Review.

PMID:
17181844
5.

The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery.

Salz T, Sandler RS.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Nov;6(11):1185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Review.

6.

The association between surgical volume, survival and quality of care.

Al-Sahaf M, Lim E.

J Thorac Dis. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S152-5. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.04.08. Review.

7.

Learning curve: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer surgery.

Renzulli P, Laffer UT.

Recent Results Cancer Res. 2005;165:86-104. Review.

PMID:
15865024
8.

The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives.

Wyld L, Audisio RA, Poston GJ.

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb;12(2):115-24. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.191. Epub 2014 Nov 11. Review.

PMID:
25384943
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk