Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 19

1.

Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level.

Runyon MS, Richman PB, Kline JA; Pulmonary Embolism Research Consortium Study Group.

Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;14(1):53-7. Epub 2006 Nov 21.

2.

Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.

Lucassen W, Geersing GJ, Erkens PM, Reitsma JB, Moons KG, B├╝ller H, van Weert HC.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):448-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007. Review.

PMID:
21969343
3.

Does this patient have pulmonary embolism?

Chunilal SD, Eikelboom JW, Attia J, Miniati M, Panju AA, Simel DL, Ginsberg JS.

JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2849-58. Review.

PMID:
14657070
4.

External validation and comparison of recently described prediction rules for suspected pulmonary embolism.

Righini M, Bounameaux H.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004 Sep;10(5):345-9. Review.

PMID:
15316430
5.

New methods for estimating pretest probability in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Ghali WA, Cornuz J, Perrier A.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2001 Sep;7(5):349-53. Review.

PMID:
11584188
6.

Systematic review: diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules for venous thromboembolism in elderly.

Siccama RN, Janssen KJ, Verheijden NA, Oudega R, Bax L, van Delden JJ, Moons KG.

Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Apr;10(2):304-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Dec 3. Review.

PMID:
21130902
7.

Context, automated decision support, and clinical practice guidelines: does the literature apply to the United States practice environment?

Edmonson SR, Smith-Akin KA, Bernstam EV.

Int J Med Inform. 2007 Jan;76(1):34-41. Epub 2006 Mar 9. Review.

PMID:
16524767
8.

VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.

Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, Rodger M, Wuillemin WA, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92. Review.

PMID:
19404542
9.

Assessment of pretest risk for venous thromboembolic disease.

Brown J.

Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001 Nov;19(4):861-8. Review.

PMID:
11762275
10.
11.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to acute pulmonary embolism in an emergency department.

Tilli P, Testa A, Covino M, Portale P, Capaldi L, Carbone L, Silveri NG.

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006 Mar-Apr;10(2):91-8. Review.

PMID:
16705955
12.

Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine.

Stiell IG, Wells GA.

Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Apr;33(4):437-47. Review.

PMID:
10092723
13.

Evidence-based decision making in small animal therapeutics.

Kochevar DT, Fajt V.

Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2006 Sep;36(5):943-59, v. Review.

PMID:
16984821
14.

Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards.

Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L.

N Engl J Med. 1985 Sep 26;313(13):793-9. Review.

PMID:
3897864
15.

Evaluating clinical decision rules.

Shapiro SE.

West J Nurs Res. 2005 Aug;27(5):655-64. Review.

PMID:
16020572
16.

Decision trees: an overview and their use in medicine.

Podgorelec V, Kokol P, Stiglic B, Rozman I.

J Med Syst. 2002 Oct;26(5):445-63. Review.

PMID:
12182209
17.

Developing an international register of clinical prediction rules for use in primary care: a descriptive analysis.

Keogh C, Wallace E, O'Brien KK, Galvin R, Smith SM, Lewis C, Cummins A, Cousins G, Dimitrov BD, Fahey T.

Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jul;12(4):359-66. doi: 10.1370/afm.1640. Review.

18.
19.

Clinical Prediction and Decision Rules in Neurosurgery: A Critical Review.

Stein SC, Attiah MA.

Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug;77(2):149-55; discussion 156. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000818. Review.

PMID:
26068135
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk