Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 33

1.

Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, Smidt N, van Rijn JC, Bossuyt PM.

CMAJ. 2006 Feb 14;174(4):469-76.

PMID:
16477057
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.

Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Sutton AJ, Chapple C, Assassa RP, Shaw C, Cheater F.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(6):1-132, iii-iv. Review.

PMID:
16487456
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

Dinnes J, Deeks J, Kirby J, Roderick P.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(12):1-113, iii. Review.

PMID:
15774235
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):1-6. Review.

PMID:
12507953
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jan 7;138(1):40-4. Review.

PMID:
12513043
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review.

Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J.

Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 3;140(3):189-202. Review.

PMID:
14757617
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting.

Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Halligan S, Hopewell S, Cornelius V, Altman DG.

BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):413. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Review.

PMID:
16849365
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
8.

The effect of study design biases on the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: a meta-analysis.

Song JW, Kim HM, Bellfi LT, Chung KC.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1029-44. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182043630. Review.

PMID:
21364405
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
9.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Clin Biochem. 2003 Feb;36(1):2-7. Review.

PMID:
12554053
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

[Reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy according to a standard method; the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD)].

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Feb 22;147(8):336-40. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
12661118
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Jan;119(1):18-22. Review.

PMID:
12520693
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
12.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

BMJ. 2003 Jan 4;326(7379):41-4. Review.

PMID:
12511463
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
13.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, De Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;181(1):51-5. Review.

PMID:
12818829
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: a systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies.

Freeman K, Szczepura A, Osipenko L.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Feb;142(2):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Dec 9. Review.

PMID:
19081172
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review.

Willis BH, Quigley M.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 9;11:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-163. Review.

PMID:
22151233
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
16.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):24-8. Review.

PMID:
12511664
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.

Manchikanti L, Derby R, Wolfer L, Singh V, Datta S, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40. Review.

PMID:
19461821
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
18.

Systematic reviews of clinical decision tools for acute abdominal pain.

Liu JL, Wyatt JC, Deeks JJ, Clamp S, Keen J, Verde P, Ohmann C, Wellwood J, Dawes M, Altman DG.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(47):1-167, iii-iv. Review.

PMID:
17083855
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.

PMID:
16487455
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
20.

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of technologies used to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery: a systematic review and decision-analytical model.

Burch J, Hinde S, Palmer S, Beyer F, Minton J, Marson A, Wieshmann U, Woolacott N, Soares M.

Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(34):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta16340. Review.

PMID:
22985954
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk