Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 40

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 16337601)

1.

Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination.

McIlwraith MJ, Vaisman A, Liu Y, Fanning E, Woodgate R, West SC.

Mol Cell. 2005 Dec 9;20(5):783-92. Erratum in: Mol Cell. 2006 Feb 3;21(3):445. Mcllwraith, Michael J [corrected to McIlwraith, Michael J].

2.

Homologous recombination is promoted by translesion polymerase poleta.

Rattray AJ, Strathern JN.

Mol Cell. 2005 Dec 9;20(5):658-9. Review.

3.

Multiple two-polymerase mechanisms in mammalian translesion DNA synthesis.

Livneh Z, Ziv O, Shachar S.

Cell Cycle. 2010 Feb 15;9(4):729-35. Epub 2010 Feb 23. Review.

4.

Xeroderma pigmentosum variant and error-prone DNA polymerases.

Kannouche P, Stary A.

Biochimie. 2003 Nov;85(11):1123-32. Review.

PMID:
14726018
5.

Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems.

Budzowska M, Kanaar R.

Cell Biochem Biophys. 2009;53(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s12013-008-9039-y. Epub 2008 Nov 26. Review.

PMID:
19034694
6.

Post-replication repair in DT40 cells: translesion polymerases versus recombinases.

Hochegger H, Sonoda E, Takeda S.

Bioessays. 2004 Feb;26(2):151-8. Review.

PMID:
14745833
7.

Ubiquitination of PCNA and the polymerase switch in human cells.

Kannouche PL, Lehmann AR.

Cell Cycle. 2004 Aug;3(8):1011-3. Epub 2004 Aug 7. Review.

8.

Replication of damaged DNA by translesion synthesis in human cells.

Lehmann AR.

FEBS Lett. 2005 Feb 7;579(4):873-6. Review.

9.

The roles of DNA polymerase ζ and the Y family DNA polymerases in promoting or preventing genome instability.

Sharma S, Helchowski CM, Canman CE.

Mutat Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;743-744:97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 26. Review.

10.

Interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair based on the structure of RecG helicase.

Briggs GS, Mahdi AA, Weller GR, Wen Q, Lloyd RG.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 29;359(1441):49-59. Review.

11.

[Non-mutagenic and mutagenic post-replicative DNA repair in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells].

Zhestianikov VD.

Tsitologiia. 2000;42(9):837-43. Review. Russian.

PMID:
11077674
12.

Translesion synthesis in mammalian cells.

Lehmann AR.

Exp Cell Res. 2006 Aug 15;312(14):2673-6. Epub 2006 Jun 20. Review.

PMID:
16854411
13.

Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.

Michel B, Grompone G, Florès MJ, Bidnenko V.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 31;101(35):12783-8. Epub 2004 Aug 24. Review.

14.

The nonmutagenic repair of broken replication forks via recombination.

Cox MM.

Mutat Res. 2002 Dec 29;510(1-2):107-20. Review.

PMID:
12459447
15.

poliota-dependent lesion bypass in vitro.

Vaisman A, Frank EG, McDonald JP, Tissier A, Woodgate R.

Mutat Res. 2002 Dec 29;510(1-2):9-22. Review.

PMID:
12459439
16.

Translesion synthesis DNA polymerases and control of genome stability.

Shcherbakova PV, Fijalkowska IJ.

Front Biosci. 2006 Sep 1;11:2496-517. Review.

PMID:
16720328
17.

[Advances of study on human translesion synthesis DNA polymerase eta].

Hu GH, Zhuang ZX.

Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2006 Nov;35(6):808-11. Review. Chinese.

PMID:
17290774
18.

Therapeutic exploitation of tumor cell defects in homologous recombination.

Powell SN, Kachnic LA.

Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2008 May;8(4):448-60. Review.

PMID:
18473729
19.

Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.

Lambert S, Carr AM.

Biochimie. 2005 Jul;87(7):591-602. Epub 2004 Dec 10. Review.

PMID:
15989976
20.

Replication of damaged DNA.

Lehmann AR.

Cell Cycle. 2003 Jul-Aug;2(4):300-2. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk