Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 24

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 16043084)

1.

Architectures and tools for innovative Health Information Systems: the Guide Project.

Ciccarese P, Caffi E, Quaglini S, Stefanelli M.

Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):553-62. Epub 2005 Mar 25.

PMID:
16043084
2.

Computer-based execution of clinical guidelines: a review.

Isern D, Moreno A.

Int J Med Inform. 2008 Dec;77(12):787-808. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.05.010. Epub 2008 Jul 17. Review.

PMID:
18639485
3.

Expert clinical rules automate steps in delivering evidence-based care in the electronic health record.

Brokel JM, Shaw MG, Nicholson C.

Comput Inform Nurs. 2006 Jul-Aug;24(4):196-205; quiz 206-7. Review.

PMID:
16849914
4.

Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support.

de Clercq PA, Blom JA, Korsten HH, Hasman A.

Artif Intell Med. 2004 May;31(1):1-27. Review.

PMID:
15182844
5.
6.

Using health information technology to improve hypertension management.

Goldstein MK.

Curr Hypertens Rep. 2008 Jun;10(3):201-7. Review.

PMID:
18765090
7.

The promise of simultaneous transformation of practice and research with the use of clinical information systems.

Lang NM.

Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct;56(5):232-6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.011. Review.

PMID:
18922275
8.

Computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Where are we and where are we going ?

Sonnenberg FA, Hagerty CG.

Yearb Med Inform. 2006:145-58. Review.

PMID:
17051309
9.

Can decision support improve nurses'use of knowledge?

Ehrenberg A, Fraser KD, Gunningberg L.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;31(5):256-8. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
15867723
10.

Models for guideline representation.

Quaglini S, Ciccarese P.

Neurol Sci. 2006 Jun;27 Suppl 3:S240-4. Review.

PMID:
16752058
11.

Healthcare information systems architecture.

Ferrara FM.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;45:1-9. Review.

PMID:
10175347
12.

Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations.

Donaldson NE, Rutledge DN, Ashley J.

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1 Suppl 1:S41-51. Review.

PMID:
17129334
13.

Costs and benefits of health information technology.

Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB.

Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr;(132):1-71. Review.

14.

Nursing standards to support the electronic health record.

Westra BL, Delaney CW, Konicek D, Keenan G.

Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct;56(5):258-266.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.005. Review.

PMID:
18922281
15.

Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Mar-Apr;6(2):104-14. Review.

16.

Implementing security in a distributed web-based EHCR.

Sucurovic S.

Int J Med Inform. 2007 May-Jun;76(5-6):491-6. Epub 2006 Nov 3. Review.

PMID:
17084662
17.

Health information systems - past, present, future.

Haux R.

Int J Med Inform. 2006 Mar-Apr;75(3-4):268-81. Epub 2005 Sep 19. Review.

PMID:
16169771
18.

Information technology: building nursing intellectual capital for the information age.

Simpson RL.

Nurs Adm Q. 2007 Jan-Mar;31(1):84-8. Review.

PMID:
17198124
19.

Knowledge and process management in health care organizations.

Stefanelli M.

Methods Inf Med. 2004;43(5):525-35. Review.

PMID:
15702214
20.

[Issues of practice guideline].

Yamamoto M.

Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2003 Nov;43(11):847-9. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
15152482
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk