Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 10

1.

Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality.

Chen L, Singer B, Guirao A, Porter J, Williams DR.

Optom Vis Sci. 2005 May;82(5):358-69.

PMID:
15894912
2.

Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance.

Lombardo M, Lombardo G.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):313-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.026. Review.

PMID:
20152616
3.
4.

Finite schematic eye models and their accuracy to in-vivo data.

Bakaraju RC, Ehrmann K, Papas E, Ho A.

Vision Res. 2008 Jul;48(16):1681-94. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.009. Epub 2008 Jun 17. Review.

6.

Unresolved issues in the prediction of subjective refraction from wavefront aberration maps.

Thibos LN.

J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):S533-6. Review.

PMID:
15523971
7.

[Examination of visual performance by adaptive optics].

Weigel D, Jungnickel H, Babovsky H, Kiessling A, Kowarschik R.

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013 Dec;230(12):1199-206. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351070. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Review. German.

PMID:
24327282
8.

[Advance in wave-front aberration in optometry].

Wang Y, Zhao KX.

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Jan;40(1):66-9. Review. Chinese. No abstract available.

PMID:
14989973
9.

[Image methods in the development of optometry].

Shelepin IuE, Makulov VB.

Med Tekh. 1996 Jul-Aug;(4):41-3. Review. Russian.

PMID:
8965667
10.

A guide to performing basic manifest refractometry.

Garber N.

J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol. 2000 Mar-Apr;19(2):84-93; quiz 94-5. Review. Erratum in: J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol 2000 May-Jun;19(3):157.

PMID:
11075078
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk