Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 38

1.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease.

Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):547-57.

PMID:
14530225
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings.

Stroszczynski C, Hunerbein M.

Abdom Imaging. 2005 May-Jun;30(3):314-23. Review.

PMID:
15965779
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Is MRCP equivalent to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction in orthotopic liver transplant recipients? A meta-analysis.

Jorgensen JE, Waljee AK, Volk ML, Sonnenday CJ, Elta GH, Al-Hawary MM, Singal AG, Taylor JR, Elmunzer BJ.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):955-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.014. Epub 2011 Feb 12. Review.

PMID:
21316670
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

[MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography)--an assessment of current status].

Merkle EM, Nüssle K, Glasbrenner B, Tomczak R, Preclik G, Rieber A, Adler G, Brambs HJ.

Z Gastroenterol. 1998 Mar;36(3):215-24. Review. German.

PMID:
9577905
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Imaging techniques in patients with biliary obstruction.

Cieszanowski A, Chomicka D, Andrzejewska M, Pruszyński B, Pawlak J, Mustafa AM.

Med Sci Monit. 2000 Nov-Dec;6(6):1197-202. Review.

PMID:
11208479
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected biliary obstruction.

Kalra M, Sahani D, Ahmad A, Saini S.

Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2002 Apr;4(2):160-6. Review.

PMID:
11900682
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J, Thomas S, Blakeborough T, Walters SJ, Bouchier H.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Mar;8(10):iii, 1-89. Review.

PMID:
14982656
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
8.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Laing AD, Gibson RN.

Australas Radiol. 1999 Aug;43(3):284-93. Review.

PMID:
10901920
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Magnetic resonance imaging and diseases of the liver and biliary tract. Part 2. Magnetic resonance cholangiography and angiography and conclusions.

Macdonald GA, Peduto AJ.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Sep;15(9):992-9. Review.

PMID:
11059927
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiography.

Saad WE, Ginat D.

Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Jun;11(2):74-89. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2008.07.002. Review.

PMID:
18922453
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary abnormalities in postcholecystectomy patients: a probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies.

Howard K, Lord SJ, Speer A, Gibson RN, Padbury R, Kearney B.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Winter;22(1):109-18. Review.

PMID:
16673687
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

MR cholangiopancreatography in malignant biliary obstruction.

Pavone P, Laghi A, Passariello R.

Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1999 Oct;20(5):317-23. Review.

PMID:
10527137
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review.

Dinnes J, Loveman E, McIntyre L, Waugh N.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(29):iii, 1-166. Review.

PMID:
14567906
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
14.

[Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography].

Miletić D, Stimac D, Uravić M, Petranović D, Mazur-Grbac M, Valković P, Franko A.

Lijec Vjesn. 2007 Oct-Nov;129(10-11):336-43. Review. Croatian.

PMID:
18257334
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography following liver transplantation.

Matar LD, Frazer C, Jeffrey G.

Australas Radiol. 1999 Aug;43(3):279-83. Review.

PMID:
10901919
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.

Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Sutton AJ, Chapple C, Assassa RP, Shaw C, Cheater F.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(6):1-132, iii-iv. Review.

PMID:
16487456
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
18.

Measurement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis.

Goodacre S, Sampson F, Stevenson M, Wailoo A, Sutton A, Thomas S, Locker T, Ryan A.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 May;10(15):1-168, iii-iv. Review.

PMID:
16707072
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease.

Collins R, Cranny G, Burch J, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Craig D, Wright K, Berry E, Gough M, Kleijnen J, Westwood M.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 May;11(20):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-184. Review.

PMID:
17462170
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
20.

[Diagnosis of cholestatic disorders].

Geier A, Gartung C, Dietrich CG, Lammert F, Wasmuth HE, Matern S.

Med Klin (Munich). 2003 Sep 15;98(9):499-509. Review. German.

PMID:
14551707
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk