Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 21

1.

Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study.

Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Feb 5;95(3):230-6.

2.

Population-based prevalence estimates of history of colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy: review and analysis of recent trends.

Stock C, Haug U, Brenner H.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):366-381.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.018. Epub 2009 Oct 20. Review.

PMID:
19846082
3.

Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control.

Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, Ries LA, Howe HL, Wingo PA, Jemal A, Ward E, Anderson RN, Edwards BK.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 3;95(17):1276-99. Review. Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Nov 5;95(21):1641.

4.

Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients.

L√ľning TH, Keemers-Gels ME, Barendregt WB, Tan AC, Rosman C.

Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):994-7. Epub 2007 Apr 24. Review.

PMID:
17453289
5.

[Colonic perforations complicating colonoscopy. Apropos of 15 consecutive cases observed over 16 years].

Ettersperger L, Zeitoun P, Thiefin G.

Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1995 Dec;19(12):1018-22. Review. French.

PMID:
8729414
6.

Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy.

Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ.

Endoscopy. 2009 Nov;41(11):941-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215179. Epub 2009 Oct 28. Review.

PMID:
19866393
7.

Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Day LW, Kwon A, Inadomi JM, Walter LC, Somsouk M.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):885-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.023. Review.

8.

[Few complications, but only little effect on cancer related death by screening colonoscopy].

Holst LL, Andersen O, Fischer TK.

Ugeskr Laeger. 2013 Aug 12;175(33):1852-5. Review. Danish.

PMID:
23937871
10.
11.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Sigmoidoscopy in the periodic health examination of asymptomatic adults.

Selby JV, Friedman GD.

JAMA. 1989 Jan 27;261(4):594-601. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
2642564
12.

Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Waye JD, Kahn O, Auerbach ME.

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996 Apr;6(2):343-77. Review.

PMID:
8673332
13.

Risk factors for colonic perforation after screening computed tomographic colonography: a multicentre analysis and review of the literature.

Atalla MA, Rozen WM, Niewiadomski OD, Croxford MA, Cheung W, Ho YH.

J Med Screen. 2010;17(2):99-102. doi: 10.1258/jms.2010.010042. Review.

PMID:
20660440
15.

Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in the elderly patient.

Day LW, Walter LC, Velayos F.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;106(7):1197-206;quiz 1207. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.128. Epub 2011 Apr 26. Review.

PMID:
21519362
16.

Technical assessment of direct colonoscopy screening: procedural success, safety, and feasibility.

Nelson DB.

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002 Jan;12(1):77-84. Review.

PMID:
11916163
17.

Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome.

Lohsiriwat V.

World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan 28;16(4):425-30. Review.

18.

Management of perforation of the colon at colonoscopy.

Kavin H, Sinicrope F, Esker AH.

Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Feb;87(2):161-7. Review.

PMID:
1734693
19.

[What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice].

Kato S, Kobayashi H, Kuwabara H, Makita S, Oohira M.

Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2005 May;106(5):361. Review. Japanese. No abstract available.

PMID:
15934556
20.

Post-Colonoscopy Complications: A Systematic Review, Time Trends, and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.

Reumkens A, Rondagh EJ, Bakker CM, Winkens B, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug;111(8):1092-101. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.234. Epub 2016 Jun 14. Review.

PMID:
27296945
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk