Format
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 5

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 12556542)

1.

A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients.

Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, van Boven WJ, de la Rivière AB, Borst C, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Buskens E, de Jaegere PP; Octopus Study Group.

N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 30;348(5):394-402.

2.

Does off-pump or minimally invasive coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Bainbridge D, Cheng D, Martin J, Novick R; Evidence-based Peri-operative Clinical Outcomes Research (EPiCOR) Group.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):623-31. Review.

PMID:
17320555
3.

Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.

Møller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, Steinbrüchel DA, Gluud C.

Eur Heart J. 2008 Nov;29(21):2601-16. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn335. Epub 2008 Jul 15. Review.

4.

Meta-analysis of short-term and mid-term outcomes following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Reston JT, Tregear SJ, Turkelson CM.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Nov;76(5):1510-5. Review.

PMID:
14602277
5.

[Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. State of the art 2006 and results in comparison with conventional coronary artery bypass strategies].

Rastan AJ, Walther T, Falk V, Gummert JF, Eckenstein JI, Mohr FW.

Herz. 2006 Aug;31(5):384-95. Review. German.

PMID:
16944057
Format
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk