Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 27

1.

Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Gourdier AL, Cornuz J, Perneger T, Perrier A.

Am J Med. 2002 Sep;113(4):269-75.

PMID:
12361811
2.

External validation and comparison of recently described prediction rules for suspected pulmonary embolism.

Righini M, Bounameaux H.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004 Sep;10(5):345-9. Review.

PMID:
15316430
3.

Prognostic models for selecting patients with acute pulmonary embolism for initial outpatient therapy.

Jiménez D, Yusen RD.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008 Sep;14(5):414-21. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3283043e44. Review.

PMID:
18664971
4.

VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.

Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, Rodger M, Wuillemin WA, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92. Review.

PMID:
19404542
5.

Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G, Nendaz M, Perneger T, Bounameaux H, Perrier A, Righini M.

J Thromb Haemost. 2010 May;8(5):957-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03801.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2. Review.

6.

New methods for estimating pretest probability in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Ghali WA, Cornuz J, Perrier A.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2001 Sep;7(5):349-53. Review.

PMID:
11584188
7.

Measurement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis.

Goodacre S, Sampson F, Stevenson M, Wailoo A, Sutton A, Thomas S, Locker T, Ryan A.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 May;10(15):1-168, iii-iv. Review.

8.

Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.

Tamariz LJ, Eng J, Segal JB, Krishnan JA, Bolger DT, Streiff MB, Jenckes MW, Bass EB.

Am J Med. 2004 Nov 1;117(9):676-84. Review.

PMID:
15501206
9.

Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care.

Hendriksen JM, Geersing GJ, Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Stoffers HE, van Weert HC, Büller HR, Hoes AW, Moons KG.

BMJ. 2015 Sep 8;351:h4438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4438. Review.

10.

Does this patient have pulmonary embolism?

Chunilal SD, Eikelboom JW, Attia J, Miniati M, Panju AA, Simel DL, Ginsberg JS.

JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2849-58. Review.

PMID:
14657070
11.

[Diagnostic strategy and comparison of clinical scores for pulmonary embolism].

Blondon M, Le Gal G, Righini M.

Rev Med Interne. 2010 Nov;31(11):742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 25. Review. French.

12.

Pulmonary embolism: from clinical presentation to clinical probability assessment.

Perrier A.

Semin Vasc Med. 2001 Nov;1(2):147-54. Review.

PMID:
15199497
13.

Assessment of pretest risk for venous thromboembolic disease.

Brown J.

Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001 Nov;19(4):861-8. Review.

PMID:
11762275
14.

Clinical manifestation of pulmonary embolism.

Lee LC, Shah K.

Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001 Nov;19(4):925-42. Review.

PMID:
11762280
15.

Prognostic accuracy of clinical prediction rules for early post-pulmonary embolism all-cause mortality: a bivariate meta-analysis.

Kohn CG, Mearns ES, Parker MW, Hernandez AV, Coleman CI.

Chest. 2015 Apr;147(4):1043-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1888. Review.

PMID:
25317677
16.

Overview and assessment of risk factors for pulmonary embolism.

Soo Hoo GW.

Expert Rev Respir Med. 2013 Apr;7(2):171-91. doi: 10.1586/ers.13.7. Review.

PMID:
23547993
17.

Using decision rules in primary care practice.

Ebell MH.

Prim Care. 1995 Jun;22(2):319-40. Review.

PMID:
7617790
18.

Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG.

JAMA. 1997 Feb 12;277(6):488-94. Review.

PMID:
9020274
19.

Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards.

Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L.

N Engl J Med. 1985 Sep 26;313(13):793-9. Review.

PMID:
3897864
20.

Diagnostic prediction rules: principles, requirements and pitfalls.

Knottnerus JA.

Prim Care. 1995 Jun;22(2):341-63. Review.

PMID:
7617791
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk