Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 15

Related Articles by Review for PubMed (Select 12187173)

1.

Linking physician characteristics and medicare claims data: issues in data availability, quality, and measurement.

Baldwin LM, Adamache W, Klabunde CN, Kenward K, Dahlman C, L Warren J.

Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8 Suppl):IV-82-95.

PMID:
12187173
2.

Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data.

Riley GF.

Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S51-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819c95aa. Review.

PMID:
19536019
3.

Linking Medicare and national survey data.

Lillard LA, Farmer MM.

Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):691-5. Review.

PMID:
9382381
4.

Changing physician behavior: does medical review of Part B Medicare claims make a difference?

Nyman JA, Feldman R, Shapiro J, Grogan C, Link D.

Inquiry. 1990 Summer;27(2):127-37. Review.

PMID:
2142131
5.

Using existing data to address important clinical questions in critical care.

Cooke CR, Iwashyna TJ.

Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):886-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827bfc3c. Review.

6.

Practice databases and their uses in clinical research.

Tierney WM, McDonald CJ.

Stat Med. 1991 Apr;10(4):541-57. Review.

PMID:
2057654
7.

Record linkage for pharmacoepidemiological studies in cancer patients.

Herk-Sukel MP, Lemmens VE, Poll-Franse LV, Herings RM, Coebergh JW.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):94-103. doi: 10.1002/pds.2205. Epub 2011 Aug 2. Review.

PMID:
21812067
8.

State-level cancer quality assessment and research: building and sustaining the data infrastructure.

Lipscomb J, Gillespie TW.

Cancer J. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):246-56. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182296422. Review.

PMID:
21799333
9.

Considerations for observational research using large data sets in radiation oncology.

Jagsi R, Bekelman JE, Chen A, Chen RC, Hoffman K, Shih YC, Smith BD, Yu JB.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Sep 1;90(1):11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.013. Review.

PMID:
25195986
10.

Administrative database research has unique characteristics that can risk biased results.

van Walraven C, Austin P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;65(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Nov 9. Review.

PMID:
22075111
11.

Using state and federal claims data to evaluate the patterns and costs of cancer care.

Desch CE, Penberthy LT.

Cancer Treat Res. 1998;97:53-69. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9711409
12.

Existing data analysis in pediatric critical care research.

Bennett TD, Spaeder MC, Matos RI, Watson RS, Typpo KV, Khemani RG, Crow S, Benneyworth BD, Thiagarajan RR, Dean JM, Markovitz BP; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI).

Front Pediatr. 2014 Jul 29;2:79. doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00079. eCollection 2014. Review.

13.

The PDQ (Physician Data Query), the cancer database, in oncological clinical practice.

Fare C, Ugolini D.

Cancer Treat Rev. 1991 Jun;18(2):137-43. Review.

PMID:
1804524
14.

Administrative record linkage as a tool for public health research.

Jutte DP, Roos LL, Brownell MD.

Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:91-108. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-100700. Review.

PMID:
21219160
15.

Linkage between neurological registry data and administrative data.

Jette N, Atwood K, Hamilton M, Hayward R, Day L, Mobach T, Maxwell C, Fortin CM, Fiebelkorn G, Barlow K, Shevell M, Kapral MK, Casha S, Johnston M, Wiebe S, Korngut L, Pringsheim T.

Can J Neurol Sci. 2013 Jul;40(4 Suppl 2):S32-4. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
23787264
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk