Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 36

1.

Examining the evidence in anesthesia literature: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews.

Choi PT, Halpern SH, Malik N, Jadad AR, Tramèr MR, Walder B.

Anesth Analg. 2001 Mar;92(3):700-9.

PMID:
11226105
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

PMID:
20181324
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.

Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Dec;35(8):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010. Review.

PMID:
19836897
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

State of the evidence on acute asthma management in children: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews.

Boluyt N, van der Lee JH, Moyer VA, Brand PL, Offringa M.

Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(6):1334-43. Review.

PMID:
18055684
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.

Neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia for procedures on the lower half of the body: systematic review of systematic reviews.

Barbosa FT, Castro AA, de Miranda CT.

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(2):235-43. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70121-6. Review.

PMID:
22440378
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.

MacDonald SL, Canfield SE, Fesperman SF, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):648-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.127. Epub 2010 Jun 19. Review.

PMID:
20639030
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information?

Bramwell VH, Williams CJ.

Ann Oncol. 1997 Dec;8(12):1185-95. Review.

PMID:
9496383
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
8.

Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review.

Roundtree AK, Kallen MA, Lopez-Olivo MA, Kimmel B, Skidmore B, Ortiz Z, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013763
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

A review of quality assessment of the methodology used in guidelines and systematic reviews on oral mucositis.

Potting C, Mistiaen P, Poot E, Blijlevens N, Donnelly P, van Achterberg T.

J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jan;18(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02493.x. Review.

PMID:
19120727
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.

Horvath AR, Pewsner D.

Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Apr;342(1-2):23-39. Review.

PMID:
15026264
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.
12.

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.

PMID:
14499048
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews.

Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(41):1-90. Review.

PMID:
14670218
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
14.

Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review.

Pieper D, Buechter R, Jerinic P, Eikermann M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;65(12):1267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Sep 6. Review.

PMID:
22959594
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.

Suebnukarn S, Ngamboonsirisingh S, Rattanabanlang A.

J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):602-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Feb 21. Review.

PMID:
20307731
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions.

Melchiors AC, Correr CJ, Venson R, Pontarolo R.

Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Feb;34(1):32-42. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9592-0. Epub 2011 Dec 20. Review.

PMID:
22183578
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor.

Mullan RJ, Flynn DN, Carlberg B, Tleyjeh IM, Kamath CC, LaBella ML, Erwin PJ, Guyatt GH, Montori VM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013767
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Complementary medicine and safety: a systematic investigation of design and reporting of systematic reviews.

Pilkington K, Boshnakova A.

Complement Ther Med. 2012 Feb-Apr;20(1-2):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 6. Review.

PMID:
22305252
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Where are the systematic reviews in transfusion medicine? A study of the transfusion evidence base.

Dorée C, Stanworth S, Brunskill SJ, Hopewell S, Hyde CJ, Murphy MF.

Transfus Med Rev. 2010 Oct;24(4):286-94. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2010.05.003. Review.

PMID:
20851331
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

The quality of systematic reviews in hand surgery: an analysis using AMSTAR.

Momeni A, Lee GK, Talley JR.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr;131(4):831-7. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818d24. Review.

PMID:
23542254
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk