Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 17

1.

Use of comorbidity scores for control of confounding in studies using administrative databases.

Schneeweiss S, Maclure M.

Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;29(5):891-8. Review.

2.
3.

[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].

Renou S, Hergueta T, Flament M, Mouren-Simeoni MC, Lecrubier Y.

Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. Review. French.

PMID:
15107714
4.

Identifying priorities in methodological research using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data: report from an international consortium.

De Coster C, Quan H, Finlayson A, Gao M, Halfon P, Humphries KH, Johansen H, Lix LM, Luthi JC, Ma J, Romano PS, Roos L, Sundararajan V, Tu JV, Webster G, Ghali WA.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 15;6:77.

5.

Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Plosker GL, Figgitt DP.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. Review.

PMID:
15099124
6.

The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. Review.

7.

A systematic review identifies valid comorbidity indices derived from administrative health data.

Yurkovich M, Avina-Zubieta JA, Thomas J, Gorenchtein M, Lacaille D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 31. Review.

PMID:
25441702
8.

A systematic review of validated methods for identifying pancreatitis using administrative data.

Moores K, Gilchrist B, Carnahan R, Abrams T.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21 Suppl 1:194-202. doi: 10.1002/pds.2334. Review.

PMID:
22262606
9.

Why and how to control for age in occupational epidemiology.

Consonni D, Bertazzi PA, Zocchetti C.

Occup Environ Med. 1997 Nov;54(11):772-6. Review.

10.

Comorbidity indices.

Moltó A, Dougados M.

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Sep-Oct;32(5 Suppl 85):S-131-4. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Review.

PMID:
25365102
11.

Systematic review of comorbidity indices for administrative data.

Sharabiani MT, Aylin P, Bottle A.

Med Care. 2012 Dec;50(12):1109-18. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825f64d0. Review.

PMID:
22929993
12.

Confounding and control of confounding in nonexperimental studies of medications in patients with CKD.

Bradbury BD, Gilbertson DT, Brookhart MA, Kilpatrick RD.

Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 Jan;19(1):19-26. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2012.01.001. Review.

PMID:
22364797
13.

Administrative data. Baby or bathwater?

Black C, Roos NP.

Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):3-5. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9431326
14.

[Roaming through methodology. XIII. Matching as a rule is not useful].

Verbeek AL.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 May 15;143(20):1037-40. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
10368730
15.

Methodology, design, and analytic techniques to address measurement of comorbid disease.

Lash TL, Mor V, Wieland D, Ferrucci L, Satariano W, Silliman RA.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Mar;62(3):281-5. Review.

16.

The use of primary care databases: case-control and case-only designs.

Smeeth L, Donnan PT, Cook DG.

Fam Pract. 2006 Oct;23(5):597-604. Epub 2006 Jun 20. Review.

17.

Confounding variables and comorbidity in sarcopenia research.

Miller JP.

Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1997;5:S35-8. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9331381
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk