Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 33

1.
2.
3.

Intention-to-treat analysis in the chronic suppurative otitis media trials.

Otwombe KN, Ogutu B.

East Afr Med J. 2003 Jun;80(6):308-11. Review.

PMID:
12953740
4.

Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.

Strech D, Soltmann B, Weikert B, Bauer M, Pfennig A.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;72(9):1214-21. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06166yel. Epub 2011 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
21294992
5.

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.

Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19010643
6.
7.

Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.

8.

Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in parenting research: the issue of intention to treat.

Whittaker K, Sutton C, Burton C.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Oct;60(10):858-64. Review.

9.

Handling missing data in RCTs; a review of the top medical journals.

Bell ML, Fiero M, Horton NJ, Hsu CH.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 19;14:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-118. Review.

10.

Intention-to-treat analysis: who is in? Who is out?

Kruse RL, Alper BS, Reust C, Stevermer JJ, Shannon S, Williams RH.

J Fam Pract. 2002 Nov;51(11):969-71. Review. Erratum in: J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;51(12):1079..

PMID:
12485553
11.
12.

Overview of studies of treatments for hand eczema-the EDEN hand eczema survey.

Van Coevorden AM, Coenraads PJ, Svensson A, Bavinck JN, Diepgen TL, Naldi L, Elsner P, Williams HC; European Dermato-Epidemiology Network (Eden).

Br J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;151(2):446-51. Review.

PMID:
15327553
13.

Nonadherence to treatment protocol in published randomised controlled trials: a review.

Dodd S, White IR, Williamson P.

Trials. 2012 Jun 18;13:84. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-84. Review.

14.

Are missing data adequately handled in cluster randomised trials? A systematic review and guidelines.

Díaz-Ordaz K, Kenward MG, Cohen A, Coleman CL, Eldridge S.

Clin Trials. 2014 Oct;11(5):590-600. doi: 10.1177/1740774514537136. Epub 2014 Jun 5. Review.

PMID:
24902924
15.
16.

Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials.

Eldridge S, Ashby D, Bennett C, Wakelin M, Feder G.

BMJ. 2008 Apr 19;336(7649):876-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39517.495764.25. Epub 2008 Mar 25. Review.

17.

Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods literature.

Alshurafa M, Briel M, Akl EA, Haines T, Moayyedi P, Gentles SJ, Rios L, Tran C, Bhatnagar N, Lamontagne F, Walter SD, Guyatt GH.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049163. Epub 2012 Nov 15. Review.

18.

Methodological issues in trials assessing primary prophylaxis of venous thrombo-embolism.

Thabut G, Estellat C, Boutron I, Samama CM, Ravaud P.

Eur Heart J. 2006 Jan;27(2):227-36. Epub 2005 Oct 13. Review.

19.

Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies.

Sculpher MJ, Pang FS, Manca A, Drummond MF, Golder S, Urdahl H, Davies LM, Eastwood A.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(49):iii-iv, 1-192. Review.

20.

Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.

Pildal J, Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Forfang E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC.

BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1049. Epub 2005 Apr 7. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk