Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 20

Cited In for PubMed (Select 9059521)

1.

The impact factor of leading cardiovascular journals: where is your paper best cited?

OptHof T, Coronel R.

Neth Heart J. 2002 Apr;10(4):198-202. No abstract available.

2.

The reporting of observational clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging studies: a systematic review.

Guo Q, Parlar M, Truong W, Hall G, Thabane L, McKinnon M, Goeree R, Pullenayegum E.

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e94412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094412. eCollection 2014. Review.

3.

The progress of emergency medicine in Taiwan, China, and Hong Kong: perspective from publications in Emergency Medicine Journals, 1992-2011.

Lee CH, Chaou CH, Lin CC.

Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:682375. doi: 10.1155/2014/682375. Epub 2014 Feb 23.

4.

Impact factor 2013 of the Netherlands Heart Journal surpasses 2.0.

Opthof T.

Neth Heart J. 2014 Apr;22(4):137-8. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0538-8.

5.

The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations.

Eyre-Walker A, Stoletzki N.

PLoS Biol. 2013 Oct;11(10):e1001675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675. Epub 2013 Oct 8.

6.

The impact factor of the Netherlands Heart Journal in 2013.

Opthof T.

Neth Heart J. 2013 Jul;21(7-8):319-21. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0443-6. No abstract available.

7.

Publication of research article: an art or science?

Kapoor S, Sikka P, Saxena K.

Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Jan;3(1):96-8. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.109459.

8.
9.

One more time: bibliometric analysis of scientific output remains complicated.

Opthof T, Wilde AA.

Neth Heart J. 2011 Aug;19(7-8):359-60. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0180-7. No abstract available.

10.

Bibliometric data in clinical cardiology revisited. The case of 37 Dutch professors.

Opthof T, Wilde AA.

Neth Heart J. 2011 May;19(5):246-55. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0128-y.

11.

Temporal trends in the impact factor of European versus USA biomedical journals.

Karageorgopoulos DE, Lamnatou V, Sardi TA, Gkegkes ID, Falagas ME.

PLoS One. 2011 Feb 9;6(2):e16300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016300.

12.
13.

A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures.

Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Chute R.

PLoS One. 2009 Jun 29;4(6):e6022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.

15.

The use of bibliometric indicators to help peer-review assessment.

Haeffner-Cavaillon N, Graillot-Gak C.

Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):33-8. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0004-2. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Review.

16.

Analyzing the impact of an author's publications.

Vucovich LA, Baker JB, Smith JT.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2008 Jan;96(1):63-6. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.1.63. No abstract available.

17.
18.

Using citation data to improve retrieval from MEDLINE.

Bernstam EV, Herskovic JR, Aphinyanaphongs Y, Aliferis CF, Sriram MG, Hersh WR.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):96-105. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

19.
20.

Journal impact factors: a 'bioequivalence' issue?

Rostami-Hodjegan A, Tucker GT.

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Feb;51(2):111-7.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk