Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 26

1.

Applying a novel combination of techniques to develop a predictive model for diabetes complications.

Sangi M, Win KT, Shirvani F, Namazi-Rad MR, Shukla N.

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0121569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121569. eCollection 2015.

2.
3.

Evaluation of an online interactive Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) versus online self-directed learning: a randomised controlled trial.

Schroter S, Jenkins RD, Playle RA, Walsh KM, Probert C, Kellner T, Arnhofer G, Owens DR.

BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jun 16;11:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-35.

4.

Computerized prompting and feedback of diabetes care: a review of the literature.

Boren SA, Puchbauer AM, Williams F.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;3(4):944-50. Review.

5.

The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care.

Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsay CR, Eccles MP, Grimshaw J.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD001096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001096.pub2. Review.

6.

The effect of feedback to general practitioners on quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of the literature.

Guldberg TL, Lauritzen T, Kristensen JK, Vedsted P.

BMC Fam Pract. 2009 May 6;10:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-30. Review.

7.

Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Dexheimer JW, Talbot TR, Sanders DL, Rosenbloom ST, Aronsky D.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):311-20. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2555. Epub 2008 Feb 28. Review.

8.

A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care.

Jackson CL, Bolen S, Brancati FL, Batts-Turner ML, Gary TL.

J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21(2):105-10. Epub 2005 Dec 22. Review.

9.

A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care.

Bates DW, Ebell M, Gotlieb E, Zapp J, Mullins HC.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-10.

10.

The quality case for information technology in healthcare.

Bates DW.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002 Oct 23;2:7.

11.
12.

How the past teaches the future: ACMI distinguished lecture.

Hammond WE.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):222-34.

13.

Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies.

Chuang JH, Hripcsak G, Jenders RA.

Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:146-50. Review.

16.

A template-based approach to support utilization of clinical practice guidelines within an electronic health record.

Henry SB, Douglas K, Galzagorry G, Lahey A, Holzemer WL.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 May-Jun;5(3):237-44.

17.

Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects.

Zielstorff RD.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 May-Jun;5(3):227-36.

18.
19.

Use of CLIPS for representation and inference in a clinical event monitor.

Pankaskie MC, Wagner MM.

Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:193-7.

20.

Automated direct-from-patient information collection for evidence-based diabetes care.

Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hayward RS, Pim MA, Horsman J.

Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:81-5.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk