Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 53

2.

Predictors of Recurrent Ductal Carcinoma In Situ after Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Kim JY, Park K, Kang G, Kim HJ, Gwak G, Shin YJ.

J Breast Cancer. 2016 Jun;19(2):185-90. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.2.185. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

3.

Deep tissue volume imaging of birefringence through fibre-optic needle probes for the delineation of breast tumour.

Villiger M, Lorenser D, McLaughlin RA, Quirk BC, Kirk RW, Bouma BE, Sampson DD.

Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 1;6:28771. doi: 10.1038/srep28771.

4.

Correlation of breast tissue histology and optical signatures to improve margin assessment techniques.

Kennedy S, Caldwell M, Bydlon T, Mulvey C, Mueller J, Wilke L, Barry W, Ramanujam N, Geradts J.

J Biomed Opt. 2016 Jun 1;21(6):66014. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.6.066014. No abstract available.

PMID:
27327487
5.

A prospective pilot study of analysis of surgical margins of breast cancers using high-resolution sonography.

Scaranelo AM, Moshonov H, Escallon J.

Springerplus. 2016 Mar 1;5:251. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1921-2. eCollection 2016.

6.

The Role of Intraoperative Pathologic Assessment in the Surgical Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Decker MR, Trentham-Dietz A, Loconte NK, Neuman HB, Smith MA, Punglia RS, Greenberg CC, Wilke LG.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;23(9):2788-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5192-5. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

PMID:
27026436
7.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of whole-mount pathology processing for patients with early breast cancer undergoing breast conservation.

Hong NJ, Clarke GM, Yaffe MJ, Holloway CM.

Curr Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(Suppl 1):S23-31. doi: 10.3747/co.23.2917. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

8.

Structured Illumination Microscopy and a Quantitative Image Analysis for the Detection of Positive Margins in a Pre-Clinical Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Sarcoma.

Fu HL, Mueller JL, Whitley MJ, Cardona DM, Willett RM, Kirsch DG, Brown JQ, Ramanujam N.

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0147006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147006. eCollection 2016.

9.

Spectrally encoded confocal microscopy for diagnosing breast cancer in excision and margin specimens.

Brachtel EF, Johnson NB, Huck AE, Rice-Stitt TL, Vangel MG, Smith BL, Tearney GJ, Kang D.

Lab Invest. 2016 Apr;96(4):459-67. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2015.158. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

10.

Association between use of warfarin with common sulfonylureas and serious hypoglycemic events: retrospective cohort analysis.

Romley JA, Gong C, Jena AB, Goldman DP, Williams B, Peters A.

BMJ. 2015 Dec 7;351:h6223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6223.

11.

Quantitative micro-elastography: imaging of tissue elasticity using compression optical coherence elastography.

Kennedy KM, Chin L, McLaughlin RA, Latham B, Saunders CM, Sampson DD, Kennedy BF.

Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 27;5:15538. doi: 10.1038/srep15538.

12.

Development of Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans (SCAMPs) in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Caterson SA, Singh M, Orgill D, Ghazinouri R, Han E, Ciociolo G, Laskowski K, Greenberg JO.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Sep 9;3(9):e510. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000504. eCollection 2015 Sep. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul;4(7):e510.

13.

Prognostic Factors for Local, Loco-regional and Systemic Recurrence in Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Kümmel A, Kümmel S, Barinoff J, Heitz F, Holtschmidt J, Weikel W, Lorenz-Salehi F, du Bois A, Harter P, Traut A, Blohmer JU, Ataseven B.

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Jul;75(7):710-718.

14.

Variation in guideline adherence in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma care: impact of patient and hospital characteristics.

Stienen JJ, Hermens RP, Wennekes L, van de Schans SA, van der Maazen RW, Dekker HM, Liefers J, van Krieken JH, Blijlevens NM, Ottevanger PB; PEARL study group.

BMC Cancer. 2015 Aug 8;15:578. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1547-8.

15.

Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.

Landercasper J, Attai D, Atisha D, Beitsch P, Bosserman L, Boughey J, Carter J, Edge S, Feldman S, Froman J, Greenberg C, Kaufman C, Morrow M, Pockaj B, Silverstein M, Solin L, Staley A, Vicini F, Wilke L, Yang W, Cody H 3rd.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3174-83. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4759-x. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

16.

Assessment of Practice Patterns Following Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer.

DeSnyder SM, Hunt KK, Smith BD, Moran MS, Klimberg S, Lucci A.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3250-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4666-1. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

17.

Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.

Zysk AM, Chen K, Gabrielson E, Tafra L, May Gonzalez EA, Canner JK, Schneider EB, Cittadine AJ, Scott Carney P, Boppart SA, Tsuchiya K, Sawyer K, Jacobs LK.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3356-62. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4665-2. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

PMID:
26202553
18.

Surgical margin reporting in breast conserving surgery: Does compliance with guidelines affect re-excision and mastectomy rates?

Persing S, Jerome MA, James TA, Callas P, Mace J, Sowden M, Goodwin A, Weaver DL, Sprague BL.

Breast. 2015 Oct;24(5):618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jul 18.

PMID:
26199197
19.

Cancer Care Delivery Research: Building the Evidence Base to Support Practice Change in Community Oncology.

Kent EE, Mitchell SA, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Kaluzny AD, Hautala JA, Grad O, Ballard RM, McCaskill-Stevens WJ, Kramer BS, Clauser SB.

J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 20;33(24):2705-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.6210. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

20.

The Changing World of Breast Cancer: A Radiologist's Perspective.

Kuhl CK.

Invest Radiol. 2015 Sep;50(9):615-28. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000166. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk