Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 14

1.

Those Responsible for Approving Research Studies Have Poor Knowledge of Research Study Design: a Knowledge Assessment of Institutional Review Board Members.

Mhaskar R, Pathak EB, Wieten S, Guterbock TM, Kumar A, Djulbegovic B.

Acta Inform Med. 2015 Aug;23(4):196-201. doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.196-201. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

2.

Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials.

O'Rourke PP, Carrithers J, Patrick-Lake B, Rice TW, Corsmo J, Hart R, Drezner MK, Lantos JD.

Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597685. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

PMID:
26374678
3.
4.
5.

Unequal treatment of human research subjects.

Resnik DB.

Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Feb;18(1):23-32. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9569-6.

6.

Institutional review board barriers and solutions encountered in the Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now Study: a national multicenter practice-based implementation trial.

Maclaughlin EJ, Ardery G, Jackson EA, Ives TJ, Young RB, Fike DS, Carter BL.

Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Sep;33(9):902-11. doi: 10.1002/phar.1276. Epub 2013 May 3.

7.

Variations in institutional review board reviews of a multi-center, Emergency Department (ED)-based genetic research protocol.

Lee DC, Peak DA, Jones JS, Domeier RM, Hendry PL, Rathlev NK, Swor RA, McLean SA.

Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;31(6):967-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

8.

How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb;8(1):8-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.8.

9.

Ethical issues in neonatal and pediatric clinical trials.

Laventhal N, Tarini BA, Lantos J.

Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012 Oct;59(5):1205-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 26. Review.

10.

How variability in the institutional review board review process affects minimal-risk multisite health services research.

Petersen LA, Simpson K, Sorelle R, Urech T, Chitwood SS.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):728-35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00011.

11.

Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.

Silberman G, Kahn KL.

Milbank Q. 2011 Dec;89(4):599-627. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00644.x. Review.

12.

The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: the result is more animal-based research.

Rice MJ.

Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2011 Jun 7;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-6-12.

13.

Increasing burden of institutional review in multicenter clinical trials of infertility: the Reproductive Medicine Network experience with the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PPCOS) I and II studies.

Schlaff WD, Zhang H, Diamond MP, Coutifaris C, Casson PR, Brzyski RG, Christman GM, Barnhart KT, Trussell JC, Krawetz SA, Snyder PJ, Ohl D, Santoro N, Eisenberg E, Huang H, Legro RS; Reproductive Medicine Network.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.069. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

14.

A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn.

Abbott L, Grady C.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Mar;6(1):3-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk