Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 14

1.

Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Practice Guidelines Based on Systematic Reviews?

Lindsley K, Li T, Ssemanda E, Virgili G, Dickersin K.

Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):884-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Review.

PMID:
26804762
2.

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA; PRISMA-P Group.

Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

4.
5.

Analysis of quality of clinical practice guidelines for otorhinolaryngology in China.

Zhang ZW, Liu XW, Xu BC, Wang SY, Li L, Kang YY, Guo YF.

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053566. Epub 2013 Jan 18. Review.

6.

The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties.

Hoffmann T, Erueti C, Thorning S, Glasziou P.

BMJ. 2012 May 17;344:e3223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3223.

7.

The quality of research synthesis in surgery: the case of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Martel G, Duhaime S, Barkun JS, Boushey RP, Ramsay CR, Fergusson DA.

Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 17;1:14. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-14.

8.

What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.

Li T, Vedula SS, Scherer R, Dickersin K.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):367-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00009.

9.

Establishing a minimum dataset for prospective registration of systematic reviews: an international consultation.

Booth A, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, Stewart L.

PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027319. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

10.

Open Medicine endorses PROSPERO.

Palepu A, Kendall C, Moher D.

Open Med. 2011;5(1):e65-6. Epub 2011 Mar 29. No abstract available.

11.

The evidence base for interventions delivered to children in primary care: an overview of cochrane systematic reviews.

Gill PJ, Wang KY, Mant D, Hartling L, Heneghan C, Perera R, Klassen T, Harnden A.

PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023051. Epub 2011 Aug 1. Review.

12.

Best practice in systematic reviews: the importance of protocols and registration.

PLoS Medicine Editors.

PLoS Med. 2011 Feb;8(2):e1001009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009. Epub 2011 Feb 22. No abstract available.

13.

Register systematic reviews.

Li T.

CMAJ. 2010 May 18;182(8):805. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110-2064. No abstract available.

14.

Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process.

Kirkham JJ, Altman DG, Williamson PR.

PLoS One. 2010 Mar 22;5(3):e9810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009810.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk