Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 20

1.

Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Physical Symptoms Among Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: A Systematic Review.

Flythe JE, Powell JD, Poulton CJ, Westreich KD, Handler L, Reeve BB, Carey TS.

Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Dec;66(6):1033-46. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Review.

PMID:
26210069
2.

Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.

Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, Sabharwal R, Rein A, Konopka K, Frank L.

J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

3.

Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute.

Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, Schrandt S, Sheridan S, Gerson J, Konopka K, Daugherty S.

Qual Life Res. 2015 May;24(5):1033-41. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0893-3. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

4.

Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments.

Rooney AA, Boyles AL, Wolfe MS, Bucher JR, Thayer KA.

Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Jul;122(7):711-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307972. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

5.

An analytical framework for delirium research in palliative care settings: integrated epidemiologic, clinician-researcher, and knowledge user perspectives.

Lawlor PG, Davis DH, Ansari M, Hosie A, Kanji S, Momoli F, Bush SH, Watanabe S, Currow DC, Gagnon B, Agar M, Bruera E, Meagher DJ, de Rooij SE, Adamis D, Caraceni A, Marchington K, Stewart DJ.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Aug;48(2):159-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.12.245. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

6.

Addressing multimorbidity in evidence integration and synthesis.

Trikalinos TA, Segal JB, Boyd CM.

J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Apr;29(4):661-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2661-4. Epub 2014 Jan 18. Review.

7.

Comparative effectiveness topics from a large, integrated delivery system.

Danforth KN, Patnode CD, Kapka TJ, Butler MG, Collins B, Compton-Phillips A, Baxter RJ, Weissberg J, McGlynn EA, Whitlock EP.

Perm J. 2013 Fall;17(4):4-13. doi: 10.7812/TPP/13-036.

8.

Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research on management of primary angle closure: a survey of Asia-Pacific clinicians.

Yu T, Li T, Lee KJ, Friedman DS, Dickersin K, Puhan MA.

J Glaucoma. 2015 Jun-Jul;24(5):348-55. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e5616.

PMID:
23835674
9.

Preventive pharmacologic treatments for episodic migraine in adults.

Shamliyan TA, Choi JY, Ramakrishnan R, Miller JB, Wang SY, Taylor FR, Kane RL.

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Sep;28(9):1225-37. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2433-1. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

10.

Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research for cancer diagnostics using a regional stakeholder approach.

Klein G, Gold LS, Sullivan SD, Buist DS, Ramsey S, Kreizenbeck K, Snell K, Loggers ET, Gifford J, Watkins JB, Kessler L.

J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):241-55.

11.

Getting our priorities straight: a novel framework for stakeholder-informed prioritization of cancer genomics research.

Esmail LC, Roth J, Rangarao S, Carlson JJ, Thariani R, Ramsey SD, Veenstra DL, Deverka P.

Genet Med. 2013 Feb;15(2):115-22. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.103. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

13.

Debunking myths of protocol registration.

Chang SM, Slutsky J.

Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 9;1:4. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-4.

14.

Toward modernizing the systematic review pipeline in genetics: efficient updating via data mining.

Wallace BC, Small K, Brodley CE, Lau J, Schmid CH, Bertram L, Lill CM, Cohen JT, Trikalinos TA.

Genet Med. 2012 Jul;14(7):663-9.

15.

Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews.

Chung M, Newberry SJ, Ansari MT, Yu WW, Wu H, Lee J, Suttorp M, Gaylor JM, Motala A, Moher D, Balk EM, Shekelle PG.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):660-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

16.

What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.

Li T, Vedula SS, Scherer R, Dickersin K.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):367-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00009.

17.

The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines.

Gold LS, Klein G, Carr L, Kessler L, Sullivan SD.

Cancer Imaging. 2012 Jan 25;12:13-24. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0003.

18.

Missing and accounted for: gaps and areas of wealth in the public health review literature.

Tirilis D, Husson H, DeCorby K, Dobbins M.

BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 3;11:757. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-757. Review.

19.

Prioritizing research needs based on a systematic evidence review: a pilot process for engaging stakeholders.

Gold R, Whitlock EP, Patnode CD, McGinnis PS, Buckley DI, Morris C.

Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):338-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00716.x. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

20.

A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research.

Helfand M, Tunis S, Whitlock EP, Pauker SG, Basu A, Chilingerian J, Harrell FE Jr, Meltzer DO, Montori VM, Shepard DS, Kent DM; Methods Work Group of the National CTSA Strategic Goal Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Jun;4(3):188-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00282.x.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk