Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 22


Neuropsychological assessment of individuals with brain tumor: comparison of approaches used in the classification of impairment.

Dwan TM, Ownsworth T, Chambers S, Walker DG, Shum DH.

Front Oncol. 2015 Mar 11;5:56. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00056. eCollection 2015.


Frequent assessments may obscure cognitive decline.

Salthouse TA.

Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1063-9. doi: 10.1037/pas0000007. Epub 2014 May 19.


Intraindividual variability in domain-specific cognition and risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

Vaughan L, Leng I, Dagenbach D, Resnick SM, Rapp SR, Jennings JM, Brunner RL, Simpson SL, Beavers DP, Coker LH, Gaussoin SA, Sink KM, Espeland MA.

Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2013;2013:495793. doi: 10.1155/2013/495793. Epub 2013 Dec 22.


Effects of age and ability on components of cognitive change.

Salthouse TA.

Intelligence. 2013;41(5):501-511.


Is two better than one? Limb activation treatment combined with contralesional arm vibration to ameliorate signs of left neglect.

Pitteri M, Arcara G, Passarini L, Meneghello F, Priftis K.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 7;7:460. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00460. eCollection 2013.


Selectivity of attrition in longitudinal studies of cognitive functioning.

Salthouse TA.

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Jul;69(4):567-74. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt046. Epub 2013 Jun 2.


Does the direction and magnitude of cognitive change depend on initial level of ability?

Salthouse TA.

Intelligence. 2012 Jul;40(4):352-361. Epub 2012 Mar 7.


Robust cognitive change.

Salthouse TA.

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Jul;18(4):749-56. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000380. Epub 2012 May 18.


Psychometric properties of within-person across-session variability in accuracy of cognitive performance.

Salthouse TA.

Assessment. 2012 Dec;19(4):494-501. doi: 10.1177/1073191112438744. Epub 2012 Mar 2.


Using the Guttman scale to define and estimate measurement error in items over time: the case of cognitive decline and the meaning of "points lost".

Tractenberg RE, Yumoto F, Aisen PS, Kaye JA, Mislevy RJ.

PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030019. Epub 2012 Feb 17.


A Monte Carlo simulation study of the reliability of intraindividual variability.

Estabrook R, Grimm KJ, Bowles RP.

Psychol Aging. 2012 Sep;27(3):560-76. doi: 10.1037/a0026669. Epub 2012 Jan 23.


Individual differences methods for randomized experiments.

Tucker-Drob EM.

Psychol Methods. 2011 Sep;16(3):298-318. doi: 10.1037/a0023349.


Serial position effects in mild cognitive impairment.

Howieson DB, Mattek N, Seeyle AM, Dodge HH, Wasserman D, Zitzelberger T, Jeffrey K.

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Mar;33(3):292-9. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.516742. Epub 2010 Dec 2.


Influence of age on practice effects in longitudinal neurocognitive change.

Salthouse TA.

Neuropsychology. 2010 Sep;24(5):563-72. doi: 10.1037/a0019026.


Dealing with short-term fluctuation in longitudinal research.

Salthouse TA, Nesselroade JR.

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Nov;65(6):698-705. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq060. Epub 2010 Aug 23.


Incidence and nature of cognitive decline over 1 year among HIV-infected former plasma donors in China.

Cysique LA, Letendre SL, Ake C, Jin H, Franklin DR, Gupta S, Shi C, Yu X, Wu Z, Abramson IS, Grant I, Heaton RK; HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center group.

AIDS. 2010 Apr 24;24(7):983-90. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833336c8.


The paradox of cognitive change.

Salthouse TA.

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Jul;32(6):622-9. doi: 10.1080/13803390903401310. Epub 2010 Jan 8.


Implications of short-term retest effects for the interpretation of longitudinal change.

Salthouse TA, Tucker-Drob EM.

Neuropsychology. 2008 Nov;22(6):800-11. doi: 10.1037/a0013091.

Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk