Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 13

1.

Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.

Suh YS, Jang HJ, Song W, Lee HW, Kim HS, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Choi HY, Lee HM.

Korean J Urol. 2014 Dec;55(12):802-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.802. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

2.

Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Zorn KC, Mendiola FP, Rapp DE, Mikhail AA, Lin S, Orvieto MA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL.

J Robot Surg. 2007;1(2):125-132. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

3.

Prevalence and risk factors of bladder neck contracture after radical prostatectomy.

Cho HJ, Jung TY, Kim DY, Byun SS, Kwon DD, Oh TH, Ko WJ, Yoo TK.

Korean J Urol. 2013 May;54(5):297-302. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.5.297. Epub 2013 May 14.

4.

Impact of prostate volume on oncological and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic.

Choo MS, Choi WS, Cho SY, Ku JH, Kim HH, Kwak C.

Korean J Urol. 2013 Jan;54(1):15-21. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.1.15. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

5.

Optimizing postoperative sexual function after radical prostatectomy.

Tutolo M, Briganti A, Suardi N, Gallina A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Bianchi M, Passoni N, Nini A, Fossati N, Rigatti P, Montorsi F.

Ther Adv Urol. 2012 Dec;4(6):347-65. doi: 10.1177/1756287212450063.

6.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

7.

Experience of 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon: an analysis of surgical and functional outcomes.

So BK, Choi JD, Lee SY, Kim HS, Park SY, Seo SI.

Korean J Urol. 2011 Aug;52(8):517-23. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.8.517. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

8.

Contemporary referral pattern for robotic prostatectomy.

Dangle PP, Abaza R.

JSLS. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):516-9. doi: 10.4293/10860810X12924466007845.

9.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR.

J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2003-15. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0295. Epub 2010 Oct 13. Review.

10.

Biopsy related prostate status does not affect on the clinicopathological outcome of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Choi H, Ko YH, Kang SG, Kang SH, Park HS, Cheon J, Patel VR.

Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Dec;41(4):205-10. doi: 10.4143/crt.2009.41.4.205. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

11.

Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.

Liss M, Osann K, Ornstein D.

BJU Int. 2008 Aug 5;102(5):603-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07672.x. Epub 2008 Apr 24.

12.

Patient-reported validated functional outcome after extraperitoneal robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Madeb R, Golijanin D, Knopf J, Vicente I, Erturk E, Patel HR, Joseph JV.

JSLS. 2007 Oct-Dec;11(4):443-8. Review.

13.

Patient-reported validated functional outcome after extraperitoneal robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Madeb R, Golijanin D, Knopf J, Vicente I, Erturk E, Patel HR, Joseph JV.

JSLS. 2007 Jul-Sep;11(3):315-20.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk