Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 36

Cited In for PubMed (Select 15080866)

1.

Views on researcher-community engagement in autism research in the United Kingdom: a mixed-methods study.

Pellicano E, Dinsmore A, Charman T.

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 10;9(10):e109946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109946. eCollection 2014.

2.

Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review.

Sarrami-Foroushani P, Travaglia J, Debono D, Braithwaite J.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:402. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-402.

4.

UK research funding bodies' views towards public participation in health-related research decisions: an exploratory study.

van Bekkum JE, Hilton S.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 24;14:318. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-318.

5.

Examining the ethical and social issues of health technology design through the public appraisal of prospective scenarios: a study protocol describing a multimedia-based deliberative method.

Lehoux P, Gauthier P, Williams-Jones B, Miller FA, Fishman JR, Hivon M, Vachon P.

Implement Sci. 2014 Jun 21;9:81. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-81.

6.

Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocol.

Gagnon MP, Candas B, Desmartis M, Gagnon J, La Roche D, Rhainds M, Coulombe M, Dipankui MT, Légaré F.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 20;14:273. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-273.

7.
8.

What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom.

Pellicano E, Dinsmore A, Charman T.

Autism. 2014 Oct;18(7):756-70. doi: 10.1177/1362361314529627. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

9.

Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.

Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, Brito JP, Boehmer K, Hasan R, Firwana B, Erwin P, Eton D, Sloan J, Montori V, Asi N, Dabrh AM, Murad MH.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. Review.

10.

Priorities for mental health research in Europe: A survey among national stakeholders' associations within the ROAMER project.

Fiorillo A, Luciano M, Del Vecchio V, Sampogna G, Obradors-Tarragó C, Maj M; ROAMER Consortium.

World Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;12(2):165-70. doi: 10.1002/wps.20052.

11.

The cycle of bias in health research: a framework and toolbox for critical appraisal training.

Odierna DH, Forsyth SR, White J, Bero LA.

Account Res. 2013;20(2):127-41. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.768931.

12.

Public priorities for joint pain research: results from a general population survey.

Strauss VY, Carter P, Ong BN, Bedson J, Jordan KP, Jinks C; Arthritis Research UK Research Users’ Group.

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Nov;51(11):2075-82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes179. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

13.

Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: assessing how much confidence to place in the research evidence.

Lewin S, Bosch-Capblanch X, Oliver S, Akl EA, Vist GE, Lavis JN, Ghersi D, Røttingen JA, Steinmann P, Gulmezoglu M, Tugwell P, El-Jardali F, Haines A.

PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001187. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

14.

Consumer engagement and the development, evaluation, and dissemination of evidence-based parenting programs.

Sanders MR, Kirby JN.

Behav Ther. 2012 Jun;43(2):236-50. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 May 30.

15.

Prioritizing research needs based on a systematic evidence review: a pilot process for engaging stakeholders.

Gold R, Whitlock EP, Patnode CD, McGinnis PS, Buckley DI, Morris C.

Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):338-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00716.x. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

16.

Consumer input into research: the Australian Cancer Trials website.

Dear RF, Barratt AL, Crossing S, Butow PN, Hanson S, Tattersall MH.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 26;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-30.

17.

Collaborating with consumer and community representatives in health and medical research in Australia: results from an evaluation.

Payne JM, D'Antoine HA, France KE, McKenzie AE, Henley N, Bartu AE, Elliott EJ, Bower C.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 May 14;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-18.

18.

Target for improvement: a cluster randomised trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation (intervention development and study protocol).

Boivin A, Lehoux P, Lacombe R, Lacasse A, Burgers J, Grol R.

Implement Sci. 2011 May 9;6:45. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-45.

19.

Involving patients with depression in research: survey of patients' attitudes to participation.

Tallon D, Mulligan J, Wiles N, Thomas L, Peters TJ, Elgie R, Sharp D, Lewis G.

Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Apr;61(585):134-41. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X567036.

20.

Cutting the research pie: a value-weighting approach to explore perceptions about psychosocial research priorities for adults with haematological cancers.

Paul CL, Sanson-Fisher R, Douglas HE, Clinton-McHarg T, Williamson A, Barker D.

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 May;20(3):345-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01188.x.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk