Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 15

Cited In for PubMed (Select 14605612)

1.

ICU director data: using data to assess value, inform local change, and relate to the external world.

Murphy DJ, Ogbu OC, Coopersmith CM.

Chest. 2015 Apr;147(4):1168-78. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1567. Review.

PMID:
25846533
2.

Advanced hysteroscopic surgery training.

Erian MM, McLaren GR, Erian AM.

JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). pii: e2014.00396. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00396.

3.

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery.

Studnicki J, Craver C, Blanchette CM, Fisher JW, Shahbazi S.

BMC Surg. 2014 Aug 16;14:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-55.

4.

Survival after postoperative morbidity: a longitudinal observational cohort study.

Moonesinghe SR, Harris S, Mythen MG, Rowan KM, Haddad FS, Emberton M, Grocott MP.

Br J Anaesth. 2014 Dec;113(6):977-84. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu224. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

5.

Impact of alternative coding schemes on incidence rates of key complications after total hip arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a national data set.

Cram P, Ibrahim SA, Lu X, Wolf BR.

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Mar;3(1):17-26. doi: 10.1177/2151458511435723.

6.

Impact of surgeon volume on patient safety in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

Worley MJ Jr, Anwandter C, Sun CC, dos Reis R, Nick AM, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback CF, Munsell MF, Ramirez PT.

Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.452. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

7.

Quality improvement of pancreatic surgery by centralization in the western part of the Netherlands.

Gooiker GA, van der Geest LG, Wouters MW, Vonk M, Karsten TM, Tollenaar RA, Bonsing BA.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul;18(7):1821-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1511-4. Epub 2011 May 5.

8.

Failure to rescue and mortality after reoperation for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Mell MW, Kind A, Bartels CM, Smith MA.

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):346-51; discussion 351-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.030. Epub 2011 Apr 17.

9.

Striving for a better operative outcome: 101 pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Kow AW, Chan SP, Earnest A, Chan CY, Lim K, Chong SY, Lim KH, Ho CK, Chew SP, Liau KH.

HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(6):464-71. doi: 10.1080/13651820802247094.

10.

Complications of pancreatic surgery.

Ho CK, Kleeff J, Friess H, B├╝chler MW.

HPB (Oxford). 2005;7(2):99-108. doi: 10.1080/13651820510028936.

11.

High-volume versus low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustments based on clinical data.

Wouters MW, Wijnhoven BP, Karim-Kos HE, Blaauwgeers HG, Stassen LP, Steup WH, Tilanus HW, Tollenaar RA.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):80-7. Epub 2007 Nov 15.

12.

Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery.

Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA.

Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):777-83.

13.
14.

Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden.

Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M, Ye W, Johansson J, Lagergren J.

Ann Surg. 2006 Feb;243(2):204-11.

15.

Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands.

van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ.

Ann Surg. 2005 Dec;242(6):781-8, discussion 788-90. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk