Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 6

1.

Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.

Hofvind S, Skaane P, Elmore JG, Sebuødegård S, Hoff SR, Lee CI.

Radiology. 2014 Jul;272(1):52-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131502. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

2.

Establishing a gold standard for test sets: variation in interpretive agreement of expert mammographers.

Onega T, Anderson ML, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Geller B, Bogart A, Smith RA, Sickles EA, Monsees B, Bassett L, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Yankaskas BC.

Acad Radiol. 2013 Jun;20(6):731-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.01.012.

3.

Association between radiologists' experience and accuracy in interpreting screening mammograms.

Molins E, Macià F, Ferrer F, Maristany MT, Castells X.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr 25;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-91.

4.

Screening for breast cancer.

Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW.

JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56. Review.

5.

Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Théberge I, Hébert-Croteau N, Langlois A, Major D, Brisson J.

CMAJ. 2005 Jan 18;172(2):195-9.

6.

International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.

Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Koepsell TD, Desnick LM, D'Orsi CJ, Ransohoff DF.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 17;95(18):1384-93.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk