Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 15

1.

CONSORT item reporting quality in the top ten ranked journals of critical care medicine in 2011: a retrospective analysis.

Stevanovic A, Schmitz S, Rossaint R, Schürholz T, Coburn M.

PLoS One. 2015 May 28;10(5):e0128061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128061. eCollection 2015.

2.

Meta-epidemiology.

Bae JM.

Epidemiol Health. 2014 Sep 25;36:e2014019. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2014019. eCollection 2014.

3.

The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laranjo L, Arguel A, Neves AL, Gallagher AM, Kaplan R, Mortimer N, Mendes GA, Lau AY.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):243-56. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002841. Epub 2014 Jul 8. Review.

4.

The quality of reporting might not reflect the quality of the study: implications for undertaking and appraising a systematic review.

Littlewood C, Ashton J, Chance-Larsen K, May S, Sturrock B.

J Man Manip Ther. 2012 Aug;20(3):130-4. doi: 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000013.

5.

Mixing nulliparous and multiparous women in randomised controlled trials of preeclampsia prevention is debatable: evidence from a systematic review.

Simon E, Caille A, Perrotin F, Giraudeau B.

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066677. Print 2013. Review.

6.

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review.

Baron G, Perrodeau E, Boutron I, Ravaud P.

BMC Med. 2013 Mar 27;11:84. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-84. Review.

7.

Efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs.

Grimm NL, Shea KG, Leaver RW, Aoki SK, Carey JL.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):308-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2565-3. Epub 2012 Sep 8. Review.

8.

Participant informed consent in cluster randomized trials: review.

Giraudeau B, Caille A, Le Gouge A, Ravaud P.

PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040436. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Review.

9.

Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols.

Mhaskar R, Djulbegovic B, Magazin A, Soares HP, Kumar A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):602-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.016. Epub 2012 Mar 16. Review.

10.

Association of industry funding with the outcome and quality of randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Khan NA, Lombeida JI, Singh M, Spencer HJ, Torralba KD.

Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jul;64(7):2059-67. doi: 10.1002/art.34393.

11.

Trial sample size, but not trial quality, is associated with positive study outcome.

Singh JA, Murphy S, Bhandari M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;63(2):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

12.

Imperfect placebos are common in low back pain trials: a systematic review of the literature.

Machado LA, Kamper SJ, Herbert RD, Maher CG, McAuley JH.

Eur Spine J. 2008 Jul;17(7):889-904. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0664-3. Epub 2008 Apr 18. Review.

14.

Reporting of radiographic methods in randomised controlled trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.

Baron G, Boutron I, Giraudeau B, Ravaud P.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 May;66(5):651-7. Epub 2006 Dec 11. Review.

15.

Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.

Pildal J, Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Forfang E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC.

BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1049. Epub 2005 Apr 7. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk