Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 22

Cited In for PubMed (Select 11151008)

1.

A new statistical framework to assess structural alignment quality using information compression.

Collier JH, Allison L, Lesk AM, Garcia de la Banda M, Konagurthu AS.

Bioinformatics. 2014 Sep 1;30(17):i512-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu460.

2.

A new model for pore formation by cholesterol-dependent cytolysins.

Reboul CF, Whisstock JC, Dunstone MA.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Aug 21;10(8):e1003791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003791. eCollection 2014 Aug.

3.

Structures of human primase reveal design of nucleotide elongation site and mode of Pol α tethering.

Kilkenny ML, Longo MA, Perera RL, Pellegrini L.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 1;110(40):15961-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311185110. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

4.

Multiple structure alignment with msTALI.

Shealy P, Valafar H.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 May 20;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-105.

5.

Protein structure validation by generalized linear model root-mean-square deviation prediction.

Bagaria A, Jaravine V, Huang YJ, Montelione GT, Güntert P.

Protein Sci. 2012 Feb;21(2):229-38. doi: 10.1002/pro.2007. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

6.

MUSTANG-MR structural sieving server: applications in protein structural analysis and crystallography.

Konagurthu AS, Reboul CF, Schmidberger JW, Irving JA, Lesk AM, Stuckey PJ, Whisstock JC, Buckle AM.

PLoS One. 2010 Apr 6;5(4):e10048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010048.

7.

Comparison of structure-based and threading-based approaches to protein functional annotation.

Brylinski M, Skolnick J.

Proteins. 2010 Jan;78(1):118-34. doi: 10.1002/prot.22566.

8.

A structural overview of the vertebrate prion proteins.

Pastore A, Zagari A.

Prion. 2007 Jul-Sep;1(3):185-97. Epub 2007 Jul 8. Review.

9.

Fishing with (Proto)Net-a principled approach to protein target selection.

Linial M.

Comp Funct Genomics. 2003;4(5):542-8. doi: 10.1002/cfg.328.

10.

Matt: local flexibility aids protein multiple structure alignment.

Menke M, Berger B, Cowen L.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Jan;4(1):e10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040010.

11.

HotPatch: a statistical approach to finding biologically relevant features on protein surfaces.

Pettit FK, Bare E, Tsai A, Bowie JU.

J Mol Biol. 2007 Jun 8;369(3):863-79. Epub 2007 Mar 21.

12.
13.

New approaches to high-throughput structure characterization of SH3 complexes: the example of Myosin-3 and Myosin-5 SH3 domains from S. cerevisiae.

Musi V, Birdsall B, Fernandez-Ballester G, Guerrini R, Salvatori S, Serrano L, Pastore A.

Protein Sci. 2006 Apr;15(4):795-807.

14.
15.

Structural biology and bioinformatics in drug design: opportunities and challenges for target identification and lead discovery.

Blundell TL, Sibanda BL, Montalvão RW, Brewerton S, Chelliah V, Worth CL, Harmer NJ, Davies O, Burke D.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Mar 29;361(1467):413-23. Review.

16.

Functional annotation by identification of local surface similarities: a novel tool for structural genomics.

Ferrè F, Ausiello G, Zanzoni A, Helmer-Citterich M.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Aug 2;6:194.

17.

A glimpse at the organization of the protein universe.

Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 19;102(16):5641-2. Epub 2005 Apr 12. No abstract available.

18.
19.
20.

Enlarged FAMSBASE: protein 3D structure models of genome sequences for 41 species.

Yamaguchi A, Iwadate M, Suzuki E, Yura K, Kawakita S, Umeyama H, Go M.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):463-8.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk