Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 144

1.

Relation between ventricular fibrillation voltage and probability of defibrillation shocks. Analysis using Hilbert transforms.

Patwardhan A, Moghe S, Wang K, Cruise H, Leonelli F.

J Electrocardiol. 1998 Oct;31(4):317-25.

PMID:
9817215
2.

[Hilbert transform analysis of the relation between ventricular fibrillation voltage and the outcome of defibrillation shocks].

Wang K, Deng X, Guo R, Patwardhan A, Leonelli F.

Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jun;23(3):512-6. Chinese.

PMID:
16856380
3.

Integration of absolute ventricular fibrillation voltage correlates with successful defibrillation.

Kuelz KW, Hsia PW, Wise RM, Mahmud R, Damiano RJ Jr.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1994 Aug;41(8):782-91.

PMID:
7927400
4.

A critical period of ventricular fibrillation more susceptible to defibrillation: real-time waveform analysis using a single ECG lead.

Hsia PW, Frerk S, Allen CA, Wise RM, Cohen NM, Damiano RJ Jr.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Apr;19(4 Pt 1):418-30.

PMID:
8848389
5.

Vector magnitude using orthogonal ECG leads during ventricular fibrillation is associated with defibrillation outcome.

Gurunathan S, Hsia PW, Lawton J, Hua DP.

Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998 Jan-Feb;32(1):48-61.

PMID:
9475962
6.

Correlation between defibrillation shock outcome and coherence in electrocardiograms.

Patwardhan A, Moghe S, Wang K, Wright H, Leonelli F.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Sep;24(9 Pt 1):1354-62.

PMID:
11584457
7.

Bispectral energies within electrocardiograms during ventricular fibrillation are correlated with defibrillation shock outcome.

Patwardhan A, Wang K, Moghe S, Leonelli F.

Ann Biomed Eng. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):171-9.

PMID:
10199693
8.

Dynamic nature of electrocardiographic waveform predicts rescue shock outcome in porcine ventricular fibrillation.

Lightfoot CB, Nremt-P, Callaway CW, Hsieh M, Fertig KC, Sherman LD, Menegazzi JJ.

Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;42(2):230-41.

PMID:
12883511
9.

Improved nonthoracotomy defibrillation based on ventricular fibrillation waveform characteristics.

Hsia PW, Suresh G, Allen CA, Harrington G, Maskal S, Fain E, Damiano RJ Jr.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 1):1537-47.

PMID:
8946448
10.

Effect of shock timing on defibrillation success.

Hsu W, Lin Y, Heil JE, Jones J, Lang DJ.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 2):153-7.

PMID:
9121980
11.

Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.

Province RA, Fishler MG, Thakor NV.

Ann Biomed Eng. 1993;21(1):19-31.

PMID:
8434817
12.

Ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation thresholds in sheep and dogs.

Wan YK, Holley L, Einstein R.

Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 1998 Sep;121(1):77-82.

PMID:
9883570
13.

Immediate defibrillation versus interventions first in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Menegazzi JJ, Wang HE, Lightfoot CB, Fertig KC, Chengelis NL, Sherman LD, Callaway CW.

Resuscitation. 2003 Nov;59(2):261-70.

PMID:
14625118
15.
16.

The effect of an unsuccessful subthreshold shock on the energy requirement for the subsequent defibrillation.

Murakawa Y, Gliner BE, Shankar B, Thakor NV.

Am Heart J. 1989 May;117(5):1065-9.

PMID:
2711966
17.

Shock timing lowers transvenous defibrillation energy requirement.

Hsu W, Lin Y, Lang DJ, Jones JL.

J Electrocardiol. 1998;31 Suppl:35-40.

PMID:
9988003
18.
19.

Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks.

Chen PS, Shibata N, Dixon EG, Wolf PD, Danieley ND, Sweeney MB, Smith WM, Ideker RE.

J Clin Invest. 1986 Mar;77(3):810-23.

20.

Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs.

Chen PS, Wolf PD, Melnick SD, Danieley ND, Smith WM, Ideker RE.

Circ Res. 1990 Jun;66(6):1544-60.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk