Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 138

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 8498696)

1.

Sputum quality: can you tell by looking?

Flournoy DJ, Davidson LJ.

Am J Infect Control. 1993 Apr;21(2):64-9.

PMID:
8498696
2.

Insufficient quality of sputum submitted for tuberculosis diagnosis and associated factors, in Klaten district, Indonesia.

Sakundarno M, Nurjazuli N, Jati SP, Sariningdyah R, Purwadi S, Alisjahbana B, van der Werf MJ.

BMC Pulm Med. 2009 May 8;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-16.

3.

Gram stain evaluation of the quality of sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture.

Curione CJ Jr, Kaneko GS, Voss JL, Hesse F, Smith RF.

J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Mar;5(3):381-2.

4.

Impact of introducing quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) guidelines in respiratory specimen processing.

Al Balooshi N, Jamsheer A, Botta GA.

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Aug;9(8):810-5.

6.

[Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].

Suzuki K, Higuchi T.

Kekkaku. 2007 Mar;82(3):217-27. Japanese.

PMID:
17444126
7.

Comparison of six different criteria for judging the acceptability of sputum specimens.

Wong LK, Barry AL, Horgan SM.

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Oct;16(4):627-31.

8.

Multiple sampling in one day to optimize smear microscopy in children with tuberculosis in Yemen.

Al-Aghbari N, Al-Sonboli N, Yassin MA, Coulter JB, Atef Z, Al-Eryani A, Cuevas LE.

PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005140. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

9.

Quality evaluation of sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture.

McCarter YS, Robinson A.

Am J Clin Pathol. 1996 Jun;105(6):769-73.

PMID:
8659453
10.
11.

Sampling variability in the microbiological evaluation of expectorated sputa and endotracheal aspirates.

Nagendra S, Bourbeau P, Brecher S, Dunne M, LaRocco M, Doern G.

J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jun;39(6):2344-7.

12.

[Evaluation of 5 selection criteria for sputum as a valid sample for culture].

Martín JE, Catalán P, Expósito C, Pérez MT, Domínguez J, Bisquert J.

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1991 Dec;9(10):603-7. Spanish.

PMID:
1822149
13.

Realities of expectorated sputum collection in the pediatric cystic fibrosis clinic.

Radhakrishnan DK, Corey M, Dell SD.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jun;161(6):603-6.

PMID:
17548767
14.

Effect of sputum induction by hypertonic saline on specimen quality.

Chuard C, Fracheboud D, Regamey C.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Apr;39(4):211-4.

PMID:
11404062
15.

[Mycobacterial tests].

Takashima T, Higuchi T.

Kekkaku. 2008 Jan;83(1):43-59. Japanese.

PMID:
18283915
16.
17.

Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates.

Geckler RW, Gremillion DH, McAllister CK, Ellenbogen C.

J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):396-9.

18.

Impact on clinical decision making of quality control standards applied to sputum analysis in COPD.

Telgen MC, Brusse-Keizer MG, van der Valk PD, van der Palen J, Kerstjens HA, Hendrix MG.

Respir Med. 2011 Mar;105(3):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

19.

Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.

Murray PR, Washington JA.

Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339-44.

PMID:
1127999
20.

[Microbiological, macroscopic, and microscopic quality of sputum: current value of the study of their interrelationship].

Rodríguez F, Tejada F.

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1995 Mar;13(3):194-5. Spanish. No abstract available.

PMID:
7734508
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk