Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 169

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 8058251)

1.

A continuous quality improvement project to improve the quality of cervical Papanicolaou smears.

Burkman RT, Ward R, Balchandani K, Kini S.

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Sep;84(3):470-5.

PMID:
8058251
2.

Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.

Marchand L, Mundt M, Klein G, Agarwal SC.

WMJ. 2005 Aug;104(6):51-5.

3.

Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.

Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.

Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr;75(4):690-5.

PMID:
2314788
4.

Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.

Eisenberger D, Hernandez E, Tener T, Atkinson BF.

Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):755-8.

PMID:
9351759
5.
6.

Continuous quality improvement of Pap smears in an ambulatory care facility.

Pachciarz JA, Abbott MI, Gorman B, Henneman CE, Kuhl M.

QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Jul;18(7):229-35.

PMID:
1437084
7.

A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.

Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G 3rd, Schlaerth JB.

Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;80(2):241-5.

PMID:
1635737
8.

Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear.

Rahnama P, Faghihzadeh S, Ziaei S.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):66-9.

PMID:
15670299
9.

The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush.

Ferris DG, Berrey MM, Ellis KE, Petry LJ, Voxnaes J, Beatie RT.

J Fam Pract. 1992 Mar;34(3):276-80.

PMID:
1541953
10.

Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.

Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.

Acta Cytol. 1989 Nov-Dec;33(6):849-51.

PMID:
2588918
11.

Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?

van Erp EJ, Dersjant-Roorda MC, Arentz NP, Stijnen T, Trimbos JB.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989 Oct;30(2):139-44.

PMID:
2572484
12.

A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.

Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Küllü S.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;35(4):446-9.

PMID:
8717577
13.

Nylon brush improves collection of cervical cytologic specimens.

Dotters DJ, Carney CN, Droegemueller W.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Oct;159(4):814-9.

PMID:
3177528
14.

Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.

Helderman G, Graham L, Cannon D, Waters K, Feller D.

Nurse Pract. 1990 Nov;15(11):30-2.

PMID:
2255424
15.

Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.

Neinstein LS, Church J, Akiyoshi T.

J Adolesc Health. 1992 Sep;13(6):520-3.

PMID:
1390820
16.

Comparative evaluation of seven cell collection devices for cervical smears.

Kohlberger PD, Stani J, Gitsch G, Kieback DG, Breitenecker G.

Acta Cytol. 1999 Nov-Dec;43(6):1023-6. Review.

PMID:
10578973
17.

Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?

Kivlahan C, Ingram E.

Acta Cytol. 1986 May-Jun;30(3):258-60.

PMID:
3459326
18.

Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.

Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):539-43.

PMID:
8090390
19.

Use of a cervical brush for Papanicolaou smear collection. A meta-analysis.

Bauman BJ.

J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 Sep-Oct;38(5):267-75.

PMID:
8246082
20.

A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.

Fokke HE, Salvatore CM, Schipper ME, Bleker OP.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Feb;48(2):103-6.

PMID:
8491328
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk