Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 86

1.

False-positives in spontaneous reporting: should we worry about them?

Begaud B, Moride Y, Tubert-Bitter P, Chaslerie A, Haramburu F.

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Nov;38(5):401-4. Review.

PMID:
7893579
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

[Adverse drug reactions following immunization in Germany pursuant to the German Infection Protection Act and the German Medicinal Products Act from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005].

Weisser K, Meyer C, Petzold D, Mentzer D, Keller-Stanislawski B.

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 Nov;50(11):1404-17. German.

PMID:
17999134
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Risk of drug-induced agranulocytosis: the case of calcium dobesilate.

Zapater P, Horga JF, García A.

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;58(11):767-72. Epub 2003 Feb 19.

PMID:
12634984
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Power and weakness of spontaneous reporting: a probabilistic approach.

Tubert P, Bégaud B, Péré JC, Haramburu F, Lellouch J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;45(3):283-6.

PMID:
1569425
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Knowledge creation about ADRs--turning the perspective from the rear mirror to the projector?

Aagaard L, Soendergaard B, Stenver DI, Hansen EH.

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;65(3):364-76. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

PMID:
17961195
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

[Organization and results of drug vigilance in France].

Bégaud B, Chaslerie A, Haramburu F.

Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1994;42(5):416-23. French.

PMID:
7973001
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Comparing the toxicity of two drugs in the framework of spontaneous reporting: a confidence interval approach.

Tubert-Bitter P, Begaud B, Moride Y, Chaslerie A, Haramburu F.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Jan;49(1):121-3.

PMID:
8598505
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Adverse drug event surveillance and drug withdrawals in the United States, 1969-2002: the importance of reporting suspected reactions.

Wysowski DK, Swartz L.

Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jun 27;165(12):1363-9.

PMID:
15983284
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting vs event monitoring: a comparison.

Fletcher AP.

J R Soc Med. 1991 Jun;84(6):341-4.

PMID:
2061900
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Reporting of adverse drug reactions by nurses.

Morrison-Griffiths S, Walley TJ, Park BK, Breckenridge AM, Pirmohamed M.

Lancet. 2003 Apr 19;361(9366):1347-8.

PMID:
12711472
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

A conditional maximized sequential probability ratio test for pharmacovigilance.

Li L, Kulldorff M.

Stat Med. 2010 Jan 30;29(2):284-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.3780.

PMID:
19941282
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Adverse drug reactions: a review of relevant factors.

Ajayi FO, Sun H, Perry J.

J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Oct;40(10):1093-101. Review.

PMID:
11028248
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Pattern of adverse drug reactions notified by spontaneous reporting in an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital.

Jose J, Rao PG.

Pharmacol Res. 2006 Sep;54(3):226-33. Epub 2006 May 12.

PMID:
16781163
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

A quantitative approach of using genetic algorithm in designing a probability scoring system of an adverse drug reaction assessment system.

Koh Y, Yap CW, Li SC.

Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jun;77(6):421-30. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

PMID:
17921048
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

[International reporting of adverse drug reactions. Final report of CIOMS ADR Working Group].

Royer RJ, Benichou C.

Therapie. 1991 May-Jun;46(3):173-8. French.

PMID:
1792648
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Patients' role in reporting adverse drug reactions.

van Grootheest K, de Jong-van den Berg L.

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004 Jul;3(4):363-8. Review.

PMID:
15268652
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

An introduction to analytical methods for the postmarketing surveillance of veterinary vaccines.

Siev D.

Adv Vet Med. 1999;41:749-74. Review.

PMID:
9890058
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Effect of consumer reporting on signal detection: using disproportionality analysis.

Hammond IW, Rich DS, Gibbs TG.

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007 Nov;6(6):705-12. Review.

PMID:
17967159
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Post-marketing surveillance of drugs. The spontaneous reporting scheme: role of the Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee.

Roeser HP, Rohan AP.

Med J Aust. 1990 Dec 3-17;153(11-12):720-6.

PMID:
2099761
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Adverse drug reactions among inpatients in a north Indian referral hospital.

Uppal R, Jhaj R, Malhotra S.

Natl Med J India. 2000 Jan-Feb;13(1):16-8.

PMID:
10743370
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk