Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 121

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 7674501)

1.

The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies.

Lindfors KK, Rosenquist CJ.

JAMA. 1995 Sep 20;274(11):881-4. Erratum in: JAMA 1996 Jan 10;275(2):112.

PMID:
7674501
2.

Annual mammography starting at age 40: More talk, less action?

Batur P, Walsh JM.

Cleve Clin J Med. 2015 May;82(5):272-5. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.82a.14156. No abstract available.

3.

Advanced Technologies in Cervical Cancer Screening ASCCP Biennial Meeting 1998.

Cox JT, Herbst AL, Kinney W, Lorincz AT, Richart RM, Schiffman MH.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 1999 Jan;3(1 Suppl):S8. No abstract available.

PMID:
25950436
4.

Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.

Sankatsing VD, Heijnsdijk EA, van Luijt PA, van Ravesteyn NT, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ.

Int J Cancer. 2015 Apr 20. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29572. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25895135
5.

Sustaining mammography screening among the medically underserved: a follow-up evaluation.

Davis TC, Arnold CL, Bennett CL, Wolf MS, Liu D, Rademaker A.

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Apr;24(4):291-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4967. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

PMID:
25692910
6.

[Life ages].

Dosne Pasqualini C.

Medicina (B Aires). 2014;74(6):495-6. Spanish. No abstract available.

7.

An analysis of mass screening strategies using a mathematical model: comparison of breast cancer screening in Japan and the United States.

Tsunematsu M, Kakehashi M.

J Epidemiol. 2015;25(2):162-71. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140047. Epub 2014 Dec 6.

8.

Implications of CISNET modeling on number needed to screen and mortality reduction with digital mammography in women 40-49 years old.

Hendrick RE, Helvie MA, Hardesty LA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):1379-81. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12646.

PMID:
25415718
9.

Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.

Pataky R, Ismail Z, Coldman AJ, Elwood M, Gelmon K, Hedden L, Hislop G, Kan L, McCoy B, Olivotto IA, Peacock S.

J Med Screen. 2014 Dec;21(4):180-8. doi: 10.1177/0969141314549758. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

PMID:
25186116
10.

Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for integrating MRI into breast cancer screening for women at high risk.

Ahern CH, Shih YC, Dong W, Parmigiani G, Shen Y.

Br J Cancer. 2014 Oct 14;111(8):1542-51. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.458. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

PMID:
25137022
11.

Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States.

Eklund M, O'Donoghue C, Esserman LJ.

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Aug 19;161(4):305. doi: 10.7326/L14-5016-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
25133367
12.

Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States.

Helvie MA.

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Aug 19;161(4):304-5. doi: 10.7326/L14-5016-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
25133366
13.

Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States.

Keen JD.

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Aug 19;161(4):304. doi: 10.7326/L14-5016. No abstract available.

PMID:
25133365
14.

Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.

Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Kerlikowske K, Alagoz O, Berry D, Buist DS, Cevik M, Chisholm G, de Koning HJ, Huang H, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Munsell MF, Trentham-Dietz A, van Ravesteyn NT, Tosteson AN, Mandelblatt JS.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 28;106(6):dju092. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju092. Print 2014 Jun.

15.

Studies weigh cost, effectiveness of mammography.

[No authors listed]

Cancer Discov. 2014 May;4(5):OF5. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2014-030. Epub 2014 Feb 27. No abstract available.

16.

Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines.

O'Donoghue C, Eklund M, Ozanne EM, Esserman LJ.

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 4;160(3):145. doi: 10.7326/M13-1217.

17.

Cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit analyses of risk-based screening strategies for breast cancer.

Vilaprinyo E, Forné C, Carles M, Sala M, Pla R, Castells X, Domingo L, Rue M; Interval Cancer (INCA) Study Group.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e86858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086858. eCollection 2014.

18.

Improving mammography screening among the medically underserved.

Davis TC, Rademaker A, Bennett CL, Wolf MS, Carias E, Reynolds C, Liu D, Arnold CL.

J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Apr;29(4):628-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2743-3. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

19.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer control interventions in Peru.

Zelle SG, Vidaurre T, Abugattas JE, Manrique JE, Sarria G, Jeronimo J, Seinfeld JN, Lauer JA, Sepulveda CR, Venegas D, Baltussen R.

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e82575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082575. eCollection 2013.

20.

Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.

Lee CI, Bensink ME, Berry K, Musa Z, Bodnar C, Dann R, Jarvik JG, Lehman CD, Ramsey SD.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec;10(12):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.009.

PMID:
24295942
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk