Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 133

1.
2.

Correlation of intra-operative frozen section consultation with the final diagnosis at a referral center in Karachi, Pakistan.

Ahmad Z, Barakzai MA, Idrees R, Bhurgri Y.

Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008 Oct-Dec;51(4):469-73.

3.
4.

Intraoperative frozen section consultation: an analysis of accuracy in a teaching hospital.

Aijaz F, Muzaffar S, Hussainy AS, Pervez S, Hasan SH, Sheikh H.

J Pak Med Assoc. 1993 Dec;43(12):253-5.

5.

[Quality control of intraoperative diagnosis. Annual review of 1490 frozen sections].

Nigrisoli E, Gardini G.

Pathologica. 1994 Apr;86(2):191-5. Italian.

PMID:
7936765
6.

Frozen section analysis of margins for head and neck tumor resections: reduction of sampling errors with a third histologic level.

Olson SM, Hussaini M, Lewis JS Jr.

Mod Pathol. 2011 May;24(5):665-70. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.233. Epub 2011 Jan 7.

7.

The value of monitoring frozen section-permanent section correlation data over time.

Raab SS, Tworek JA, Souers R, Zarbo RJ.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Mar;130(3):337-42.

PMID:
16519561
9.

Intraoperative pathology consultation: error, cause and impact.

Mahe E, Ara S, Bishara M, Kurian A, Tauqir S, Ursani N, Vasudev P, Aziz T, Ross C, Lytwyn A.

Can J Surg. 2013 Jun;56(3):E13-8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011112.

10.

Frozen-section diagnosis in surgical pathology: a quality assurance study.

Wen MC, Chen JT, Ho WL.

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1997 Sep;13(9):534-9.

PMID:
9348730
11.

Frozen section diagnoses of 578 ovarian tumors made by pathologists with and without expertise on gynecologic pathology.

Bige O, Demir A, Saygili U, Gode F, Uslu T, Koyuncuoglu M.

Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Oct;123(1):43-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.030. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

PMID:
21767870
12.

Diagnoses made by frozen-section examination of surgical specimens in a small Canadian hospital.

Hayes MM, Jones EA, Zhang DY.

Can J Surg. 1993 Jun;36(3):236-40.

PMID:
8324669
13.
14.

An audit of intraoperative frozen section in Johor.

Khoo JJ.

Med J Malaysia. 2004 Mar;59(1):50-5.

15.

[A method of determination of the accuracy of morphological diagnosis of surgical and biopsy material].

Gribunov IuP, Perov IuL, Frank GA, Khodasevich LS.

Arkh Patol. 2004 Nov-Dec;66(6):51-4. Russian.

PMID:
15648169
16.

Frozen section diagnosis: is there discordance between what pathologists say and what surgeons hear?

Roy S, Parwani AV, Dhir R, Yousem SA, Kelly SM, Pantanowitz L.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Sep;140(3):363-9. doi: 10.1309/AJCPHUE5ENZDU4DJ.

17.

Accuracy of intra-operative frozen section consultation in south of Iran during four years.

Geramizadeh B, Larijani TR, Owji SM, Attaran SY, Torabinejad S, Aslani FS, Monabati A, Kumar PV, Tabei SZ.

Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010 Jul-Sep;53(3):414-7. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.68250.

18.
19.

Primary frozen section diagnosis by robotic microscopy and virtual slide telepathology: the University Health Network experience.

Evans AJ, Chetty R, Clarke BA, Croul S, Ghazarian DM, Kiehl TR, Perez Ordonez B, Ilaalagan S, Asa SL.

Hum Pathol. 2009 Aug;40(8):1070-81. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.012. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19540554
20.

Intraoperative consultation in digestive surgery. A consecutive series of 800 frozen sections.

Chatelain D, Shildknecht H, Trouillet N, Brasseur E, Darrac I, Regimbeau JM.

J Visc Surg. 2012 Apr;149(2):e134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 18.

PMID:
22342769
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk