Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 164

1.

Optimum x-ray spectra for mammography.

Beaman SA, Lillicrap SC.

Phys Med Biol. 1982 Oct;27(10):1209-20.

PMID:
7146094
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.

Beaman S, Lillicrap SC, Price JL.

Br J Radiol. 1983 Oct;56(670):721-7.

PMID:
6616137
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.

Boone JM, Fewell TR, Jennings RJ.

Med Phys. 1997 Dec;24(12):1863-74.

PMID:
9434969
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type.

Fahrig R, Yaffe MJ.

Med Phys. 1994 Sep;21(9):1473-81.

PMID:
7838059
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography.

Jennings RJ, Eastgate RJ, Siedband MP, Ergun DL.

Med Phys. 1981 Sep-Oct;8(5):629-39.

PMID:
7290015
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.

Künzel R, Herdade SB, Costa PR, Terini RA, Levenhagen RS.

Phys Med Biol. 2006 Apr 21;51(8):2077-91. Epub 2006 Apr 3.

PMID:
16585846
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets.

Blough MM, Waggener RG, Payne WH, Terry JA.

Med Phys. 1998 Sep;25(9):1605-12.

PMID:
9775364
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.

McKinley RL, Tornai MP, Samei E, Bradshaw ML.

Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):800-13. Erratum in: Med Phys. 2004 Nov;31(11):3163.

PMID:
15124997
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Dynamic range requirements in digital mammography.

Maidment AD, Fahrig R, Yaffe MJ.

Med Phys. 1993 Nov-Dec;20(6):1621-33.

PMID:
8309434
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Boone JM.

Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):23-37.

PMID:
10540637
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.

Sechopoulos I, D'Orsi CJ.

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008 Oct 24;9(4):2887.

PMID:
19020492
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography.

Ng KP, Kwok CS, Tang FH.

Phys Med Biol. 2000 May;45(5):1309-18.

PMID:
10843106
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.

Toroi P, Zanca F, Young KC, van Ongeval C, Marchal G, Bosmans H.

Eur Radiol. 2007 Sep;17(9):2368-75. Epub 2007 Feb 1.

PMID:
17268798
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.

Dance DR, Thilander AK, Sandborg M, Skinner CL, Castellano IA, Carlsson GA.

Br J Radiol. 2000 Oct;73(874):1056-67.

PMID:
11271898
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.

Rosado-Méndez I, Palma BA, Brandan ME.

Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5544-57.

PMID:
19175112
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.

Haus AG, Metz CE, Chiles JT, Rossmann K.

Radiology. 1976 Mar;118(3):705-9.

PMID:
1251024
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Development of contrast digital mammography.

Skarpathiotakis M, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK, Rico D, Muller S, Rick A, Jeunehomme F.

Med Phys. 2002 Oct;29(10):2419-26.

PMID:
12408316
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

[Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].

Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Lell M, Dassel MS, Bautz WA.

Rofo. 2007 May;179(5):487-91. German.

PMID:
17436182
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations.

Ma AK, Darambara DG, Stewart A, Gunn S, Bullard E.

Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5278-89.

PMID:
19175087
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

[Investigations on contrast values in mammography (author's transl)].

Schüle E, Seeger W.

Rofo. 1981 Aug;135(2):204-9. German.

PMID:
6212315
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk