Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Parameters and methods for testing artificial heart valves.

Köhler JC, Tech JG.

Int J Artif Organs. 1989 Apr;12(4):252-60.

PMID:
2722279
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

[Testing the hydrodynamic properties of heart valve prostheses with a new test apparatus].

Werner S, Wendt MO, Schichl K, Pohl M, Koch B.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 1994 Sep;39(9):204-10. German.

PMID:
7948663
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.

Jennings LM, Butterfield M, Walker PG, Watterson KG, Fisher J.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2001 Mar;10(2):269-75.

PMID:
11297215
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

A computer controlled versatile pulse duplicator for precision testing of artificial heart valves.

Schichl K, Affeld K.

Int J Artif Organs. 1993 Oct;16(10):722-8.

PMID:
8125620
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

A statistical approach to the quantitative comparison of pulsatile flow in vitro data of prosthetic heart valve testing.

Barbaro V, Grigioni M, Daniele C, Boccanera G.

J Heart Valve Dis. 1997 Jan;6(1):93-100.

PMID:
9044088
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

In vitro evaluation of prosthetic heart valves: towards comparable testing.

Barbaro V, Daniele C, Grigioni M, Palombo A, Sargentini A.

J Med Eng Technol. 1992 Jan-Feb;16(1):10-4.

PMID:
1640442
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.

Haaf P, Steiner M, Attmann T, Pfister G, Cremer J, Lutter G.

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Feb;57(1):10-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038881. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

PMID:
19169990
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

In vitro evaluation of prosthetic heart valves: anomalies and limitations.

Tindale WB, Black MM, Martin TR.

Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1982 May;3(2):115-30.

PMID:
7116789
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.

Marquez S, Hon RT, Yoganathan AP.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2001 Nov;10(6):802-11.

PMID:
11767190
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

[Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].

Song GM, Zhou JY, Hu SS, Cui JW, Song YH, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Yuan WM, Song XY.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jul 29;88(29):2059-63. Chinese.

PMID:
19080436
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.

Cox JL, Ad N, Myers K, Gharib M, Quijano RC.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;130(2):520-7.

PMID:
16077422
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.

Baldwin JT, Campbell A, Luck C, Ogilvie W, Sauter J.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997 Feb;11(2):287-92.

PMID:
9080157
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Durability/wear testing of heart valve substitutes.

Reul H, Potthast K.

J Heart Valve Dis. 1998 Mar;7(2):151-7. Review.

PMID:
9587854
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.

Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):1058-64.

PMID:
16678590
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

In vitro heart valve testing: steady versus pulsatile flow.

Black MM, Hose DR, Lamb CJ, Lawford PV, Ralph SJ.

J Heart Valve Dis. 1994 Mar;3(2):212-5.

PMID:
8012641
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling.

Bernacca GM, McColl JH, Wheatley DJ.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 May;13(3):467-77.

PMID:
15222295
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position.

Hartrumpf M, Kuehnel RU, Puchner R, Wendt MO, Pohl M, Albes JM.

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Oct;53(5):274-80.

PMID:
16208612
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position.

Hartrumpf M, Albes JM, Krempl T, Rudolph V, Wahlers T.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Mar;23(3):283-91.

PMID:
12614795
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

In vitro hydrodynamic characteristics among three bileaflet valves in the mitral position.

Feng Z, Umezu M, Fujimoto T, Tsukahara T, Nurishi M, Kawaguchi D.

Artif Organs. 2000 May;24(5):346-54.

PMID:
10848675
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

The new St. Jude Medical regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hydrodynamic performance.

Walker DK, Brendzel AM, Scotten LN.

J Heart Valve Dis. 1999 Nov;8(6):687-96.

PMID:
10616249
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk