Similar articles for PMID: 26358274

Year	Number of Results
1912	1
1915	1
1922	1
1936	1
1950	1
1955	1
1964	2
1975	1
1984	1
1985	1
1987	2
1991	3
1993	1
1994	1
1996	1
1997	2
1998	5
2000	1
2001	2
2002	3
2003	2
2004	1
2005	1
2006	3
2007	1
2008	1
2009	4
2010	5
2011	7
2012	6
2013	19
2014	16
2015	23
2016	19
2017	18
2018	10
2019	8
2020	7
2021	3
2022	8
2023	2
2024	0

1

Surgical methods for tubal pregnancy - effects on ovarian response to controlled stimulation during IVF.

Ödesjö E, Bergh C, Strandell A. Ödesjö E, et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Dec;94(12):1322-6. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12772. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015. PMID: 26358274 Free article.

2

Ovarian Response and in Vitro Fertilization Outcomes After Salpingectomy: Does Salpingectomy Indication Matter?

Pereira N, Pryor KP, Voskuilen-Gonzalez A, Lekovich JP, Elias RT, Spandorfer SD, Rosenwaks Z. Pereira N, et al. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):446-454.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Jan 7. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28069482

3

Cost-effectiveness of salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (a randomized controlled trial).

Mol F, van Mello NM, Strandell A, Jurkovic D, Ross JA, Yalcinkaya TM, Barnhart KT, Verhoeve HR, Graziosi GC, Koks CA, Mol BW, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ, van Wely M; European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group. Mol F, et al. Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2038-47. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev162. Epub 2015 Jul 13. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26173606 Clinical Trial.

4

Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Mol F, van Mello NM, Strandell A, Strandell K, Jurkovic D, Ross J, Barnhart KT, Yalcinkaya TM, Verhoeve HR, Graziosi GCM, Koks CAM, Klinte I, Hogström L, Janssen ICAH, Kragt H, Hoek A, Trimbos-Kemper TCM, Broekmans FJM, Willemsen WNP, Ankum WM, Mol BW, van Wely M, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ; European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group. Mol F, et al. Lancet. 2014 Apr 26;383(9927):1483-1489. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24499812 Clinical Trial.

5

Ovarian response to gonadotropins in patients with tubal factor infertility: salpingectomy versus nonsalpingectomy.

Lin YJ, Ou YC, Huang FJ, Lin PY, Kung FT, Lan KC. Lin YJ, et al. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):637-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 May 23. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23706676

6

Surgical diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy versus idiopathic DOR: comparison of in vitro fertilization outcome.

Roustan A, Perrin J, Debals-Gonthier M, Paulmyer-Lacroix O, Agostini A, Courbiere B. Roustan A, et al. Hum Reprod. 2015 Apr;30(4):840-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev029. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25740883

7

Prior salpingectomy impairs the retrieved oocyte number in in vitro fertilization cycles of women under 35 years old without optimal ovarian reserve.

Ho CY, Chang YY, Lin YH, Chen MJ. Ho CY, et al. PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0268021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268021. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35507603 Free PMC article.

8

Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer?

van Mello NM, Mol F, Opmeer BC, de Bekker-Grob EW, Essink-Bot ML, Ankum WM, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ. van Mello NM, et al. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):687-93. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Jun 30. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010. PMID: 20884296

9

Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges.

Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Fitzgerald CT, Horne G, Brison DR, Lieberman BA. Gelbaya TA, et al. Fertil Steril. 2006 May;85(5):1464-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.036. Epub 2006 Apr 3. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 16580673 Free article.

10

Influence of various tubal surgeries to serum antimullerian hormone level and outcome of the subsequent IVF-ET treatment.

Ni L, Sadiq S, Mao Y, Cui Y, Wang W, Liu J. Ni L, et al. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 Apr;29(4):345-9. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.743004. Epub 2013 Jan 22. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013. PMID: 23339657

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

178 results

Results by year