Similar articles for PMID: 25232460

Year	Number of Results
1984	1
1995	1
1996	1
1998	1
1999	1
2001	1
2004	1
2005	1
2006	1
2007	3
2008	7
2009	4
2010	3
2011	2
2012	4
2013	4
2014	8
2015	2
2016	7
2017	9
2018	9
2019	8
2020	15
2021	14
2022	5
2023	5
2024	1

1

Pathology handling of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens: Approaches and controversies.

Gómez-Mateo Mdel C, Sabater-Ortí L, Ferrández-Izquierdo A. Gómez-Mateo Mdel C, et al. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014 Sep 15;6(9):351-9. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i9.351. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25232460 Free PMC article. Review.

2

Towards a More Standardized Approach to Pathologic Reporting of Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimens for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Cross-continental and Cross-specialty Survey From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society Grossing Working Group.

Dhall D, Shi J, Allende DS, Jang KT, Basturk O, Adsay V, Kim GE. Dhall D, et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021 Oct 1;45(10):1364-1373. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001723. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021. PMID: 33899790 Free PMC article.

3

Prospective assessment of resection margin status following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after standardisation of margin definitions.

Pine JK, Haugk B, Robinson SM, Darne A, Wilson C, Sen G, French JJ, White SA, Manas DM, Charnley RM. Pine JK, et al. Pancreatology. 2020 Apr;20(3):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Jan 10. Pancreatology. 2020. PMID: 31996296

4

Comparison of pathology sampling protocols for pancreatoduodenectomy specimens.

Grillo F, Ferro J, Vanoli A, Delfanti S, Pitto F, Peñuela L, Bianchi R, Grami O, Fiocca R, Mastracci L. Grillo F, et al. Virchows Arch. 2020 May;476(5):735-744. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02687-6. Epub 2019 Dec 4. Virchows Arch. 2020. PMID: 31802231

5

Suicidal Ideation.

Harmer B, Lee S, Duong TVH, Saadabadi A. Harmer B, et al. 2024 Feb 5. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. 2024 Feb 5. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. PMID: 33351435 Free Books & Documents.

6

Microscopically positive (R1) resections do not affect survival in pancreatic head cancer.

Mois E, Graur F, Al-Hajjar N, Zaharie F, Bartos A, Bodea R, Zaharie T, Rusu I, Iancu C. Mois E, et al. Ann Ital Chir. 2017;88:491-496. Ann Ital Chir. 2017. PMID: 29339587

7

R1 resection in pancreatic cancer has significant impact on long-term outcome in standardized pathology modified for routine use.

Rau BM, Moritz K, Schuschan S, Alsfasser G, Prall F, Klar E. Rau BM, et al. Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3 Suppl 1):S103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Surgery. 2012. PMID: 22766366

8

Surgical margins for duodenopancreatectomy.

Coppola R, Cartillone M, Borzomati D, Nappo G, Valeri S, Petitti T, Perrone G. Coppola R, et al. Updates Surg. 2016 Sep;68(3):279-285. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0404-x. Epub 2016 Oct 25. Updates Surg. 2016. PMID: 27778242

9

Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin.

Campbell F, Smith RA, Whelan P, Sutton R, Raraty M, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P. Campbell F, et al. Histopathology. 2009 Sep;55(3):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03376.x. Histopathology. 2009. PMID: 19723142

10

Breast Specimen Processing and Reporting With an Emphasis on Margin Evaluation: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 866 Laboratories.

Guidi AJ, Tworek JA, Mais DD, Souers RJ, Blond BJ, Brown RW. Guidi AJ, et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Apr;142(4):496-506. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0626-CP. Epub 2018 Jan 12. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018. PMID: 29328775 Free article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

101 results

Results by year