Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 106

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 25172414)

1.

How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.

Al Mousa DS, Brennan PC, Ryan EA, Lee WB, Tan J, Mello-Thoms C.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

PMID:
25172414
2.

MO-F-CAMPUS-I-01: Accuracy of Radiologists Interpretation of Mammographic Breast Density.

Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell A.

Med Phys. 2015 Jun;42(6):3574. doi: 10.1118/1.4925452.

PMID:
26128752
3.

Adaptation and visual search in mammographic images.

Kompaniez-Dunigan E, Abbey CK, Boone JM, Webster MA.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 May;77(4):1081-7. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0841-5.

PMID:
25720760
4.

Mammographic breast density: comparison of methods for quantitative evaluation.

Morrish OW, Tucker L, Black R, Willsher P, Duffy SW, Gilbert FJ.

Radiology. 2015 May;275(2):356-65. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141508. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

PMID:
25559234
5.

The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.

Henderson LM, Benefield T, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Durham DD, Yankaskas BC, Bowling JM.

Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):278-89. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

PMID:
25435185
6.

Breast cancer risk analysis based on a novel segmentation framework for digital mammograms.

Chen X, Moschidis E, Taylor C, Astley S.

Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 1):536-43.

PMID:
25333160
7.

Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography.

Cole EB, Zhang Z, Marques HS, Edward Hendrick R, Yaffe MJ, Pisano ED.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct;203(4):909-16. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10187.

8.

The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography.

Morel JC, Iqbal A, Wasan RK, Peacock C, Evans DR, Rahim R, Goligher J, Michell MJ.

Clin Radiol. 2014 Nov;69(11):1112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Aug 3.

PMID:
25100302
9.

Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?

Al Mousa DS, Mello-Thoms C, Ryan EA, Lee WB, Pietrzyk MW, Reed WM, Heard R, Poulos A, Tan J, Li Y, Brennan PC.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 2.

PMID:
25097013
10.

Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.

Fowler EE, Vachon CM, Scott CG, Sellers TA, Heine JJ.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Aug;21(8):958-70. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.006.

PMID:
25018067
11.

A population-based tissue probability map-driven level set method for fully automated mammographic density estimations.

Kim Y, Hong BW, Kim SJ, Kim JH.

Med Phys. 2014 Jul;41(7):071905. doi: 10.1118/1.4881525.

PMID:
24989383
12.

Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.

Tortajada M, Oliver A, Martí R, Ganau S, Tortajada L, Sentís M, Freixenet J, Zwiggelaar R.

Comput Biol Med. 2014 Jul;50:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

PMID:
24845018
13.

Does MRI breast "density" (degree of background enhancement) correlate with mammographic breast density?

Hansen NL, Kuhl CK, Barabasch A, Strobel K, Schrading S.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Aug;40(2):483-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24495. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

PMID:
24446230
14.

What effect does mammographic breast density have on lesion detection in digital mammography?

A L Mousa DS, Ryan EA, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan PC.

Clin Radiol. 2014 Apr;69(4):333-41. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Jan 11. Review.

PMID:
24424328
15.

A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.

Hauser N, Wang Z, Kubik-Huch RA, Trippel M, Singer G, Hohl MK, Roessl E, Köhler T, van Stevendaal U, Wieberneit N, Stampanoni M.

Invest Radiol. 2014 Mar;49(3):131-7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000001.

PMID:
24141742
16.

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.

Seo N, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Cha JH, Kim H, Moon JH, Gong G, Ahn SH, Son BH.

Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):661-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113503636. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

PMID:
24005560
17.

Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.

Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J, Raghu M, Durand M, Philpotts LE.

Radiology. 2013 Dec;269(3):694-700. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130307. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

PMID:
23901124
18.

Statistical evaluation of a fully automated mammographic breast density algorithm.

Abdolell M, Tsuruda K, Schaller G, Caines J.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:651091. doi: 10.1155/2013/651091. Epub 2013 May 8.

19.

Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.

Rawashdeh MA, Lee WB, Bourne RM, Ryan EA, Pietrzyk MW, Reed WM, Heard RC, Black DA, Brennan PC.

Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):61-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122581. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

PMID:
23737538
20.

Variability of breast density assessment in short-term reimaging with digital mammography.

Kim WH, Moon WK, Kim SM, Yi A, Chang JM, Koo HR, Lee SH, Cho N.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):1724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 31.

PMID:
23727379
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk