Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 107

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 25052146)

1.

Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.

Thomas AR, Velmurugan N, Smita S, Jothilatha S.

J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1676-80. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

PMID:
25052146
2.

Comparison of debris removal with three different irrigation techniques.

Howard RK, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE, Yaccino JM.

J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jun 25.

PMID:
21846554
3.

Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.

Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L.

J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

PMID:
24139274
4.

Multivariate analysis of the cleaning efficacy of different final irrigation techniques in the canal and isthmus of mandibular posterior teeth.

Yoo YJ, Lee W, Kim HC, Shon WJ, Baek SH.

Restor Dent Endod. 2013 Aug;38(3):154-9. doi: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.154. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

6.
7.

Comparison of Different Irrigation Activation Regimens and Conventional Irrigation Techniques for the Removal of Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste from Root Canals.

Akman M, Akbulut MB, Aydınbelge HA, Belli S.

J Endod. 2015 May;41(5):720-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

PMID:
25747378
8.

In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars.

Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K.

J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):445-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

PMID:
22414827
9.

Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study.

Gade VJ, Sedani SK, Lokade JS, Belsare LD, Gade JR.

Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Oct;4(4):432-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.123019.

10.

Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals.

Capar ID, Ozcan E, Arslan H, Ertas H, Aydinbelge HA.

J Endod. 2014 Mar;40(3):451-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

PMID:
24565670
11.

A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems.

Dua D, Dua A, Uppin VM.

Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Jan;5(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.128661.

12.

A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.

Alkahtani A, Al Khudhairi TD, Anil S.

BMC Oral Health. 2014 Feb 11;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-12.

13.

Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy of the VPro EndoSafe negative-pressure irrigation technique.

Sarno MU, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Lindsey KW, Niu LN, Tay FR.

J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1631-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23146651
14.

Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of EndoVac with conventional irrigation needles in debris removal from root canal. An in-vivo study.

Kungwani ML, Prasad KP, Khiyani TS.

J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jul;17(4):374-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.136514.

15.

In vitro canal and isthmus debris removal of the self-adjusting file, K3, and WaveOne files in the mesial root of human mandibular molars.

Dietrich MA, Kirkpatrick TC, Yaccino JM.

J Endod. 2012 Aug;38(8):1140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.007.

PMID:
22794223
16.

Comparison of the effect of nonactivated self-adjusting file system, Vibringe, EndoVac, ultrasonic and needle irrigation on apical extrusion of debris.

Karatas E, Ozsu D, Arslan H, Erdogan AS.

Int Endod J. 2015 Apr;48(4):317-22. doi: 10.1111/iej.12317. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

PMID:
24861152
17.

Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals.

Nielsen BA, Craig Baumgartner J.

J Endod. 2007 May;33(5):611-5. Epub 2007 Mar 26.

PMID:
17437884
18.

Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system.

Susin L, Liu Y, Yoon JC, Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Ricucci D, Bryan T, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR.

Int Endod J. 2010 Dec;43(12):1077-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01778.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

19.
20.

Scanning electron microscopic analysis to compare the cleaning efficiency of three different irrigation systems at different root canal levels: an in vitro study.

Tambe VH, Vishwas J, Ghonmode WN, Nagmode P, Agrawal GP, Balsaraf O.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Jul 1;15(4):433-7.

PMID:
25576109
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk