Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 110

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 25045857)

1.

A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Lönnerfors C, Reynisson P, Persson J.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

PMID:
25045857
2.

A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.

Tapper AM, Hannola M, Zeitlin R, Isojärvi J, Sintonen H, Ikonen TS.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jun;177:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 15. Review.

PMID:
24703710
3.

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.

Payne TN, Dauterive FR.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

PMID:
18439499
4.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

5.

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

PMID:
20207063
6.

Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Dayaratna S, Goldberg J, Harrington C, Leiby BE, McNeil JM.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):120.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

PMID:
24060444
7.

Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Reynisson P, Persson J.

Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul;130(1):95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

PMID:
23603368
8.

A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Falcone T, Einarsson JI.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;208(5):368.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23395927
9.

Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial.

Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW, Bongers MY, Bremer GL, de Vet HC, Vierhout ME, Brolmann HA.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):145-52.

PMID:
17368247
10.

The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Smorgick N, Patzkowsky KE, Hoffman MR, Advincula AP, Song AH, As-Sanie S.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):101-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2948-z. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

PMID:
23839534
11.

A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.

Martino MA, Berger EA, McFetridge JT, Shubella J, Gosciniak G, Wejkszner T, Kainz GF, Patriarco J, Thomas MB, Boulay R.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.

PMID:
24513969
12.

Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.

Teljeur C, O'Neill M, Moran PS, Harrington P, Flattery M, Murphy L, Ryan M.

BJOG. 2014 Nov;121(12):1546-53. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12836. Epub 2014 May 9.

PMID:
24810140
13.

Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.

Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L.

BJOG. 2000 Nov;107(11):1380-5.

PMID:
11117766
14.

Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.

Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Cammarano C.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2.

PMID:
15284779
15.

Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.

Leitao MM Jr, Malhotra V, Briscoe G, Suidan R, Dholakiya P, Santos K, Jewell EL, Brown CL, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR, Gardner GJ.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3561-7.

PMID:
23797751
16.

Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.

Desille-Gbaguidi H, Hebert T, Paternotte-Villemagne J, Gaborit C, Rush E, Body G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Dec;171(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.025. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

PMID:
24135382
17.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.

Kilic GS, Moore G, Elbatanony A, Radecki C, Phelps JY, Borahay MA.

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:683703. doi: 10.1155/2011/683703. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

18.

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

El-Mowafi D, Madkour W, Lall C, Wenger JM.

J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 May;11(2):175-80.

PMID:
15200770
19.

Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD Jr, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):685-93. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ee6e4d.

PMID:
20733453
20.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.

Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S 4th, Ransom SB.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):698-705.

PMID:
17980329
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk