Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Role of computed tomography (CT) scan in staging of cervical carcinoma.

Prasad TV, Thulkar S, Hari S, Sharma DN, Kumar S.

Indian J Med Res. 2014 May;139(5):714-9.

2.

Revisiting the role of computerized tomographic scan and cystoscopy for detecting bladder invasion in the revised FIGO staging system for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Sharma DN, Thulkar S, Goyal S, Shukla NK, Kumar S, Rath GK, Julka PK, Saini G, Bahl A.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Apr;20(3):368-72. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d02d2d.

PMID:
20375799
3.
4.

Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.

Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Chi DS, Amendola MA, Brandt K, Schwartz LH, Koelliker S, Siegelman ES, Brown JJ, McGhee RB Jr, Iyer R, Vitellas KM, Snyder B, Long HJ 3rd, Fiorica JV, Mitchell DG; American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651; Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.

J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9329-37.

5.

Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.

Hancke K, Heilmann V, Straka P, Kreienberg R, Kurzeder C.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;15(10):2856-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0088-7. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

PMID:
18696156
6.

The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.

Ozsarlak O, Tjalma W, Schepens E, Corthouts B, Op de Beeck B, Van Marck E, Parizel PM, De Schepper AM.

Eur Radiol. 2003 Oct;13(10):2338-45. Epub 2003 Jun 12.

PMID:
12802611
7.

Computed tomographic evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix.

Whitley NO, Brenner DE, Francis A, Villa Santa U, Aisner J, Wiernik PH, Whitley J.

Radiology. 1982 Feb;142(2):439-46.

PMID:
7054834
8.

[Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].

Michniewicz K, Oellinger J.

Zentralbl Gynakol. 2001 Apr;123(4):222-8. Review. German.

PMID:
11370531
9.

Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.

Poon PY.

J Can Assoc Radiol. 1983 Jun;34(2):99-102.

PMID:
6885893
10.

Changing trend in the patterns of pretreatment diagnostic assessment for patients with cervical cancer in Japan.

Tomita N, Toita T, Kodaira T, Shinoda A, Uno T, Numasaki H, Teshima T, Mitsumori M.

Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;123(3):577-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.024. Epub 2011 Sep 25.

PMID:
21945554
11.

Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.

Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK, Kim HD, Lee HP, Kang SB, Lee JY, Han MC.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993 Jul-Aug;17(4):633-40.

PMID:
8331236
12.

Assessing disease extent in women with bulky or clinically evident metastatic cervical cancer: yield of pretreatment studies.

Massad LS, Calvello C, Gilkey SH, Abu-Rustum NR.

Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Mar;76(3):383-7.

PMID:
10684715
13.

Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA?

Rockall AG, Ghosh S, Alexander-Sefre F, Babar S, Younis MT, Naz S, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH.

Gynecol Oncol. 2006 May;101(2):244-9. Epub 2005 Nov 28.

PMID:
16310245
14.

Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.

Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL.

Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;86(1):43-50. Review.

PMID:
7784021
16.

Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.

Ho CM, Chien TY, Jeng CM, Tsang YM, Shih BY, Chang SC.

J Formos Med Assoc. 1992 Oct;91(10):982-90.

PMID:
1362678
17.

Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results.

Oellinger JJ, Blohmer JU, Michniewicz K, Siewert C, Wust P, Gutberlet M, Lichtenegger W, Felix R.

Zentralbl Gynakol. 2000;122(2):82-91.

PMID:
10721187
18.

Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Marincek B, Devaud MC, Triller J, Fuchs WA.

Eur J Radiol. 1984 May;4(2):118-21.

PMID:
6734609
19.

The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience.

Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Wenaden AE, Shepherd JH, Reznek RH.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 May-Jun;17(3):629-36. Epub 2007 Feb 9.

PMID:
17309561
20.

Indications for endoscopy according to the revised FIGO staging for cervical cancer after MRI and CT scanning.

Jeong BK, Huh SJ, Choi DH, Park W, Oh D, Kim T, Lee HB.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(2):80-5. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.2.80. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk