Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 117

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24956937)

1.

Integration of existing systematic reviews into new reviews: identification of guidance needs.

Robinson KA, Whitlock EP, Oneil ME, Anderson JK, Hartling L, Dryden DM, Butler M, Newberry SJ, McPheeters M, Berkman ND, Lin JS, Chang S.

Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 23;3:60. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-60.

2.

Integration of Existing Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Robinson KA, Whitlock EP, O'Neil ME, Anderson JK, Hartling L, Dryden DM, Butler M, Newberry SJ, McPheeters M, Berkman ND, Lin JS, Chang S.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Jun.

3.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

4.

Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews.

Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, McKoy NA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Sep 19. Review.

PMID:
21937195
5.

[Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews].

Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S, Bargagli AM, Vecchi S, Perucci CA.

Epidemiol Prev. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. Italian.

PMID:
16529350
6.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

7.

Decision and Simulation Modeling in Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Kuntz K, Sainfort F, Butler M, Taylor B, Kulasingam S, Gregory S, Mann E, Anderson JM, Kane RL.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Feb.

8.

The challenges of including sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a qualitative survey.

Runnels V, Tudiver S, Doull M, Boscoe M.

Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 10;3:33. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-33.

9.

Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?

Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, Coles B, Weightman AL.

Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;2:78. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-78.

10.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.

Skelly AC, Hashimoto RE, Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Fischer DJ, Wilson JR, Tetreault LA, Fehlings MG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7ebbf.

PMID:
24026148
11.
12.

Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.

Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters M, Santaguida PL, Shamliyan T, Singh K, Tsertsvadze A, Treadwell JR.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Mar 08.

13.

[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].

Amato L, Colais P, Davoli M, Ferroni E, Fusco D, Minozzi S, Moirano F, Sciattella P, Vecchi S, Ventura M, Perucci CA.

Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. Review. Italian.

PMID:
23851286
14.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Haase SC.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):955-66. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200afa9.

PMID:
21285802
15.

Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.

Bender R, Bunce C, Clarke M, Gates S, Lange S, Pace NL, Thorlund K.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;61(9):857-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.004. Review.

PMID:
18687287
16.

OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence.

Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Sep;15(9):981-1000. Epub 2007 Aug 27. Review.

17.

Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians.

Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke MJ, Garner SE, Lavis JN, Perrier L, Roberts NW, Straus SE.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;9:CD009401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2. Review.

PMID:
22972142
18.

AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.

Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, Treadwell JR, Reston JT, Bass EB, Chang S, Helfand M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):513-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.009.

PMID:
19595577
19.

Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.

Nicolau I, Ling D, Tian L, Lienhardt C, Pai M.

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Sep;17(9):1160-9. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0050. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

PMID:
23809432
20.

Frameworks for Determining Research Gaps During Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, Mckoy NA.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk