Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 142

1.

Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian.

Li L, Tian J, Tian H, Moher D, Liang F, Jiang T, Yao L, Yang K.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;67(9):1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 17.

PMID:
24841794
2.

Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?

Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, Coles B, Weightman AL.

Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;2:78. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-78.

3.

Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.

Crumley ET, Wiebe N, Cramer K, Klassen TP, Hartling L.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 10;5:24. Review.

4.

Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.

Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Scherer R.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000001. Review.

PMID:
17443625
7.

Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches.

Royle P, Milne R.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Fall;19(4):591-603.

PMID:
15095765
8.

Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.

Whiting P, Westwood M, Burke M, Sterne J, Glanville J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Oct 15.

PMID:
18313560
9.

Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study.

Sampson M, Barrowman NJ, Moher D, Clifford TJ, Platt RW, Morrison A, Klassen TP, Zhang L.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Feb 24;6:7.

11.

Electronic searching of the literature for systematic reviews of screening and diagnostic tests for preterm birth.

Honest H, Bachmann LM, Khan K.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Mar 26;107(1):19-23.

PMID:
12593888
12.

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane index most primary studies but not abstracts included in orthopedic meta-analyses.

Slobogean GP, Verma A, Giustini D, Slobogean BL, Mulpuri K.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.013. Epub 2009 Apr 11.

PMID:
19364634
13.

Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.

Parker D, Mills S, Abbey J.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.

PMID:
21631819
14.

Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.

Royle PL, Bain L, Waugh NR.

Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1386-93.

PMID:
16176201
15.

Is immediate imaging important in managing low back pain?

Andersen JC.

J Athl Train. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):99-102. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.99.

16.

Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search.

Savoie I, Helmer D, Green CJ, Kazanjian A.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Winter;19(1):168-78.

PMID:
12701949
17.

Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns?

Stevinson C, Lawlor DA.

Complement Ther Med. 2004 Dec;12(4):228-32.

PMID:
15649836
18.

An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.

Sampson M, Zhang L, Morrison A, Barrowman NJ, Clifford TJ, Platt RW, Klassen TP, Moher D.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 18;6:33.

19.

Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.

Wright K, Golder S, Rodriguez-Lopez R.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 3;14:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-73.

20.

[Systematic literature search].

Guba B.

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2008;158(1-2):62-9. doi: 10.1007/s10354-007-0500-0. German.

PMID:
18286251
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk