Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 310

1.

Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer.

Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, Michael Wilson J, Crain JL, Griffin DK.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Jul;29(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

PMID:
24794643
2.

Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.

Kahraman S, Candan ZN.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Aug 1.

PMID:
20920891
3.

Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.

Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA.

Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2794-801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu246. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

4.

Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.

Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM.

Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1173-81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

5.

Outcomes of trophectoderm biopsy on cryopreserved blastocysts: a case series.

Lathi RB, Massie JA, Gilani M, Milki AA, Westphal LM, Baker VL, Behr B.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Nov;25(5):504-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.06.021. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22985500
6.

Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.

Roy TK, Bradley CK, Bowman MC, McArthur SJ.

Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1294-301. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.046. Epub 2014 Feb 27.

PMID:
24582521
7.

A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts.

Van Landuyt L, Polyzos NP, De Munck N, Blockeel C, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G.

Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2509-18. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev218. Epub 2015 Sep 12.

PMID:
26364080
8.

Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.

El-Toukhy T, Kamal A, Wharf E, Grace J, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, Braude P.

Hum Reprod. 2009 Oct;24(10):2642-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep172. Epub 2009 Jun 30.

9.

Live birth after transfer of a twice-vitrified warmed blastocyst that had undergone trophectoderm biopsy.

Peng W, Zhang J, Shu Y.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Mar;22(3):299-302. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.12.004. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

PMID:
21273124
10.

Comparison of the clinical outcomes between fresh blastocyst and vitrified-thawed blastocyst transfer.

Ku PY, Lee RK, Lin SY, Lin MH, Hwu YM.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Dec;29(12):1353-6. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9874-z. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

11.

Large-volume vitrification of human biopsied and non-biopsied blastocysts: a simple, robust technique for cryopreservation.

Reed ML, Said AH, Thompson DJ, Caperton CL.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Feb;32(2):207-14. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0395-9. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

12.

Blastocysts can be rebiopsied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Zhang S, Tan K, Gong F, Gu Y, Tan Y, Lu C, Luo K, Lu G, Lin G.

Fertil Steril. 2014 Dec;102(6):1641-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.018. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

PMID:
25439805
13.

Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts.

McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, de Boer KA, Jansen RP.

Fertil Steril. 2005 Dec;84(6):1628-36.

PMID:
16359956
14.

The time aspect in storing vitrified blastocysts: its impact on survival rate, implantation potential and babies born.

Wirleitner B, Vanderzwalmen P, Bach M, Baramsai B, Neyer A, Schwerda D, Schuff M, Spitzer D, Stecher A, Zintz M, Zech NH.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):2950-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det361. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

15.

Assessment of clinical application of preimplantation genetic screening on cryopreserved human blastocysts.

Liu M, Su Y, Wang WH.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016 Apr 8;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0155-z.

16.

Neonatal outcomes after the transfer of vitrified blastocysts: closed versus open vitrification system.

Chen Y, Zheng X, Yan J, Qiao J, Liu P.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 Nov 21;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-107.

17.

Vitrification of day 3 cleavage-stage embryos yields better clinical outcome in comparison with vitrification of day 2 cleavage-stage embryos.

Chi F, Luo C, Yin P, Hong L, Ruan J, Huang M, Duan T, Tong G.

Zygote. 2015 Apr;23(2):169-76. doi: 10.1017/S0967199413000373. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

18.

Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study.

Wang XL, Zhang X, Qin YQ, Hao DY, Shi HR.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Sep;29(9):883-9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9814-y. Epub 2012 Jun 10.

19.

Genetic analysis of human embryos by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) improves efficiency of IVF by increasing embryo implantation rate and reducing multiple pregnancies and spontaneous miscarriages.

Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M, Maassarani G, Tortoriello D, Brody S.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Dec;92(6):1886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.029. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

PMID:
19135663
20.

Embryo survival and recipient pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh or vitrified, in vivo or in vitro produced ovine blastocysts.

Papadopoulos S, Rizos D, Duffy P, Wade M, Quinn K, Boland MP, Lonergan P.

Anim Reprod Sci. 2002 Nov 15;74(1-2):35-44.

PMID:
12379373
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk