Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Assessment of the role of DNA repair in damaged forensic samples.

Ambers A, Turnbough M, Benjamin R, King J, Budowle B.

Int J Legal Med. 2014 Nov;128(6):913-21. doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1003-3. Epub 2014 May 3.

PMID:
24792635
2.

An optimized protocol for forensic application of the PreCR™ Repair Mix to multiplex STR amplification of UV-damaged DNA.

Diegoli TM, Farr M, Cromartie C, Coble MD, Bille TW.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Jul;6(4):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 15.

PMID:
22001155
3.

DNA repair and STR PCR amplification from damaged DNA of human bloodstains.

Tie J, Uchigasaki S.

Mol Biol Rep. 2013 Feb;40(2):1505-10. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2194-7. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

PMID:
23076532
4.

Assessing PreCR™ repair enzymes for restoration of STR profiles from artificially degraded DNA for human identification.

Robertson JM, Dineen SM, Scott KA, Lucyshyn J, Saeed M, Murphy DL, Schweighardt AJ, Meiklejohn KA.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Sep;12:168-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

PMID:
24997322
5.

Performance characteristics of commercial Y-STR multiplex systems.

Mayntz-Press KA, Ballantyne J.

J Forensic Sci. 2007 Sep;52(5):1025-34. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

PMID:
17681001
6.

A comparison of DNA extraction using AutoMate Express™ and EZ1 advanced XL from liquid blood, bloodstains, and semen stains.

Fujii K, Inokuchi S, Kitayama T, Nakahara H, Mizuno N, Sekiguchi K.

J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jul;58(4):981-8. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12174. Epub 2013 May 17.

PMID:
23682556
7.

Assessment of DNA damage induced by terrestrial UV irradiation of dried bloodstains: forensic implications.

Hall A, Sims LM, Ballantyne J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Jan;8(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

PMID:
24315585
8.

Characterization of UVC-induced DNA damage in bloodstains: forensic implications.

Hall A, Ballantyne J.

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004 Sep;380(1):72-83. Epub 2004 Aug 7.

PMID:
15309360
9.

Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements.

Milos A, Selmanović A, Smajlović L, Huel RL, Katzmarzyk C, Rizvić A, Parsons TJ.

Croat Med J. 2007 Aug;48(4):486-93.

10.

Evaluation of reliability on STR typing at leukemic patients used for forensic purposes.

Filoglu G, Bulbul O, Rayimoglu G, Yediay FE, Zorlu T, Ongoren S, Altuncul H.

Mol Biol Rep. 2014 Jun;41(6):3961-72. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3264-9. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

PMID:
24562624
11.

[Personal identification using DNA polymorphism--the identification of forensic biological materials].

Shiono H.

Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi. 1996 Oct;50(5):320-30. Japanese.

PMID:
8952331
12.

DNA extraction method from bones using Maxwell® 16.

Karija Vlahović M, Kubat M.

Leg Med (Tokyo). 2012 Sep;14(5):272-5. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 23.

PMID:
22626613
13.

The molecular characterization of a depurinated trial DNA sample can be a model to understand the reliability of the results in forensic genetics.

Fattorini P, Previderè C, Sorçaburu-Cigliero S, Marrubini G, Alù M, Barbaro AM, Carnevali E, Carracedo A, Casarino L, Consoloni L, Corato S, Domenici R, Fabbri M, Giardina E, Grignani P, Baldassarra SL, Moratti M, Nicolin V, Pelotti S, Piccinini A, Pitacco P, Plizza L, Resta N, Ricci U, Robino C, Salvaderi L, Scarnicci F, Schneider PM, Seidita G, Trizzino L, Turchi C, Turrina S, Vatta P, Vecchiotti C, Verzeletti A, De Stefano F.

Electrophoresis. 2014 Nov;35(21-22):3134-44. doi: 10.1002/elps.201400141. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

PMID:
25176610
14.

AutoMate Express™ forensic DNA extraction system for the extraction of genomic DNA from biological samples.

Liu JY, Zhong C, Holt A, Lagace R, Harrold M, Dixon AB, Brevnov MG, Shewale JG, Hennessy LK.

J Forensic Sci. 2012 Jul;57(4):1022-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02084.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

PMID:
22390771
15.

STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best?

Harder M, Renneberg R, Meyer P, Krause-Kyora B, von Wurmb-Schwark N.

Croat Med J. 2012 Oct;53(5):416-22.

16.

Whole genome amplification strategy for forensic genetic analysis using single or few cell equivalents of genomic DNA.

Hanson EK, Ballantyne J.

Anal Biochem. 2005 Nov 15;346(2):246-57. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

PMID:
16212929
18.

Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods.

Quincey D, Carle G, Alunni V, Quatrehomme G.

Sci Justice. 2013 Sep;53(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 1.

PMID:
23937932
19.

Fungal DNA challenge in human STR typing of bone samples.

Calacal GC, De Ungria MC.

J Forensic Sci. 2005 Nov;50(6):1394-401.

PMID:
16382834
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk