Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Safety and tolerance of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the elderly.

George EM, Tergas AI, Ananth CV, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Prendergast E, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Wright JD.

Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jul;134(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

2.

The influence of surgical volume on morbidity and mortality of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Wright JD, Lewin SN, Deutsch I, Burke WM, Sun X, Herzog TJ.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):225.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 Apr 16.

PMID:
21684517
3.

Radical hysterectomy in the elderly patient: analysis of morbidity.

Fuchtner C, Manetta A, Walker JL, Emma D, Berman M, DiSaia PJ.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Feb;166(2):593-7.

PMID:
1536238
4.

Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, Burke WM, Lu YS, Lewin SN, Hershman DL.

Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.031. Epub 2012 Jun 24.

PMID:
22735788
6.

Radical hysterectomy in the elderly female: a comparison to patients age 50 or younger.

Geisler JP, Geisler HE.

Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Feb;80(2):258-61.

PMID:
11161869
7.

Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: morbidity and survival in relation to weight and age.

Levrant SG, Fruchter RG, Maiman M.

Gynecol Oncol. 1992 Jun;45(3):317-22.

PMID:
1612510
8.

Feasibility of radical surgery in the management of elderly patients with uterine cervical cancer in Korea.

Choi YS, Kim YH, Kang S, Jeon YT, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS, Kang SB, Lee HP.

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;59(3):165-70. Epub 2005 Jan 28.

PMID:
15677871
9.

Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.

Chai Y, Wang T, Wang J, Yang Y, Gao Y, Gao J, Gao S, Wang Y, Zhou X, Liu Z.

BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 4;14:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-63.

10.

Patterns of care and treatment outcomes for elderly women with cervical cancer.

Sharma C, Deutsch I, Horowitz DP, Hershman DL, Lewin SN, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Chao CK, Wright JD.

Cancer. 2012 Jul 15;118(14):3618-26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26589. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

11.

Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.

Corrado G, Fanfani F, Ghezzi F, Fagotti A, Uccella S, Mancini E, Sperduti I, Stevenazzi G, Scambia G, Vizza E.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.048. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

PMID:
25468748
12.

Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.

Jackson KS, Das N, Naik R, Lopes AD, Godfrey KA, Hatem MH, Monaghan JM.

Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Dec;95(3):655-61.

PMID:
15581978
13.

Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC, Milam MR, Bevers MW, Brown J, Slomovitz BM, Ramirez PT.

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):96-102.

PMID:
17601902
14.

Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;207(3):195.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.081. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

PMID:
22939724
15.

Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Wright JD, Hershman DL, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Lewin SN, Herzog TJ.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):948-58. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2090-8. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

PMID:
21989660
16.

Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: initial multi-institutional experience for treatment of invasive cervical cancer.

Boruta DM, Fagotti A, Bradford LS, Escobar PF, Scambia G, Kushnir CL, Michener CM, Fader AN.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):394-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

PMID:
24161887
17.

Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.

Covens A, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, DePetrillo AD, Lickrish G, Colgan T, Chapman W, Shaw P.

Gynecol Oncol. 2001 May;81(2):133-7.

PMID:
11330939
18.

A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 May;113(2):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

PMID:
19249082
19.

A retrospective analysis of radical hysterectomies done for cervical cancer: is there a role for the Pfannenstiel incision?

Scribner DR Jr, Kamelle SA, Gould N, Tillmanns T, Wilson MA, McMeekin S, Gold MA, Mannel RS.

Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Jun;81(3):481-4.

PMID:
11371142
20.

Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.

Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Sturla D, Serati M, Bolis P.

Surg Innov. 2013 Oct;20(5):493-501. doi: 10.1177/1553350612472986. Epub 2013 Jan 20.

PMID:
23339145
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk