Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Objective assessment of nuclear cataract: comparison of double-pass and Scheimpflug systems.

Lim SA, Hwang J, Hwang KY, Chung SH.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.032.

PMID:
24767907
2.

Clinical application of a Scheimpflug system for lens density measurements in phacoemulsification.

Kim JS, Chung SH, Joo CK.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jul;35(7):1204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.032. Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Aug;35(8):1483.

PMID:
19545809
3.

Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with Lens Opacities Classification System III and visual function.

Grewal DS, Brar GS, Grewal SP.

Ophthalmology. 2009 Aug;116(8):1436-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Jun 4.

PMID:
19500847
4.

Correlation of nuclear density using the Lens Opacity Classification System III versus Scheimpflug imaging with phacoemulsification parameters.

Gupta M, Ram J, Jain A, Sukhija J, Chaudhary M.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Dec;39(12):1818-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.052.

PMID:
24286839
5.

Correlation among lens opacities classification system III grading, visual function index-14, pentacam nucleus staging, and objective scatter index for cataract assessment.

Pan AP, Wang QM, Huang F, Huang JH, Bao FJ, Yu AY.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;159(2):241-7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

PMID:
25448993
7.
8.

Comprehensive assessment of nuclear and cortical backscatter metrics derived from rotating Scheimpflug images.

Ullrich K, Pesudovs K.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):2100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.033. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

PMID:
23062740
9.

Useful Prediction of Phacodynamics by Scheimpflug Lens Densitometry in Patients over Age 70.

Lim SA, Shin JY, Chung SH.

Semin Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr 19:0. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
27092580
10.

Grading nuclear cataract opacity by densitometry and objective optical analysis.

Ortiz D, Alió JL, Ruiz-Colechá J, Oser U.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.022.

PMID:
18655986
11.

Grading nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts using an objective scatter index measured with a double-pass system.

Vilaseca M, Romero MJ, Arjona M, Luque SO, Ondategui JC, Salvador A, Güell JL, Artal P, Pujol J.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;96(9):1204-10. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301055. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

PMID:
22790434
12.

Measurement of lens density using Scheimpflug imaging system as a screening test in the field of health examination for age-related cataract.

Lim DH, Kim TH, Chung ES, Chung TY.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):184-91. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305632. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

PMID:
25204988
13.

Correlation between cataract grading by Scheimpflug imaging and phaco time in phacoemulsification using peristaltic and venturi pumps.

Patrício MS, Almeida AC, Rodrigues MP, Guedes ME, Ferreira TB.

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov-Dec;23(6):789-92. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000293. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

PMID:
23640507
14.

Objective assessment of crystalline lens opacity level by measuring ocular light scattering with a double-pass system.

Cabot F, Saad A, McAlinden C, Haddad NM, Grise-Dulac A, Gatinel D.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;155(4):629-635, 635.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.005. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

PMID:
23317652
15.

Comparison of Dysfunctional Lens Index and Scheimpflug Lens Densitometry in the Evaluation of Age-Related Nuclear Cataracts.

Faria-Correia F, Ramos I, Lopes B, Monteiro T, Franqueira N, Ambrósio R Jr.

J Refract Surg. 2016 Apr 1;32(4):244-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160209-01.

PMID:
27070231
16.

Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.

Kim EC, Byun YS, Kim MS.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;37(10):1799-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.024. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

PMID:
21839609
17.

An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts.

Artal P, Benito A, Pérez GM, Alcón E, De Casas A, Pujol J, Marín JM.

PLoS One. 2011 Feb 4;6(2):e16823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016823.

18.

Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.

Lee KM, Kwon HG, Joo CK.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.031.

PMID:
19393887
19.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk