Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Forefoot midsole stiffness affects forefoot and rearfoot kinematics during the stance phase of gait.

Resende RA, Fonseca ST, Silva PL, Pertence AE, Kirkwood RN.

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014 Mar;104(2):183-90. doi: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.2.183.

PMID:
24725040
[PubMed - in process]
2.

Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking.

Chang R, Van Emmerik R, Hamill J.

J Biomech. 2008 Oct 20;41(14):3101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.024. Epub 2008 Sep 7.

PMID:
18778823
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Inter-segment foot motion and ground reaction forces over the stance phase of walking.

Hunt AE, Smith RM, Torode M, Keenan AM.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 Aug;16(7):592-600.

PMID:
11470301
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.

Eslami M, Begon M, Farahpour N, Allard P.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Jan;22(1):74-80. Epub 2006 Oct 17.

PMID:
17049700
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.

Pohl MB, Messenger N, Buckley JG.

Gait Posture. 2007 Feb;25(2):295-302. Epub 2006 Jun 6.

PMID:
16759862
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking.

Rattanaprasert U, Smith R, Sullivan M, Gilleard W.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Jan;14(1):14-23.

PMID:
10619086
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.

Tome J, Nawoczenski DA, Flemister A, Houck J.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;36(9):635-44. Erratum in: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Dec;36(12):968.

PMID:
17017268
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Fore- and rearfoot kinematics in high- and low-arched individuals during running.

Barnes A, Wheat J, Milner CE.

Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Jul;32(7):710-6.

PMID:
21972767
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern?

Chambon N, Delattre N, Gu├ęguen N, Berton E, Rao G.

Gait Posture. 2014 May;40(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

PMID:
24636223
[PubMed - in process]
10.

Changes in joint coupling and variability during walking following tibialis posterior muscle fatigue.

Ferber R, Pohl MB.

J Foot Ankle Res. 2011 Feb 4;4:6. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-6.

PMID:
21294889
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
11.

Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.

Monaghan GM, Lewis CL, Hsu WH, Saltzman E, Hamill J, Holt KG.

Gait Posture. 2013 May;38(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

PMID:
23117096
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

High heeled shoes: their effect on center of mass position, posture, three-dimensional kinematics, rearfoot motion, and ground reaction forces.

Snow RE, Williams KR.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 May;75(5):568-76.

PMID:
8185452
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

The effect of forefoot and arch posting orthotic designs on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics during gait.

Nawoczenski DA, Ludewig PM.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Jun;34(6):317-27.

PMID:
15233393
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Changes in foot and shank coupling due to alterations in foot strike pattern during running.

Pohl MB, Buckley JG.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Mar;23(3):334-41. Epub 2007 Nov 19.

PMID:
18006125
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

A clinically applicable six-segmented foot model.

De Mits S, Segers V, Woodburn J, Elewaut D, De Clercq D, Roosen P.

J Orthop Res. 2012 Apr;30(4):655-61. doi: 10.1002/jor.21570. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

PMID:
22021089
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width.

Pohl MB, Messenger N, Buckley JG.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Feb;21(2):175-83. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

PMID:
16269207
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Late rearfoot eversion and lower-limb internal rotation caused by changes in the interaction between forefoot and support surface.

Souza TR, Pinto RZ, Trede RG, Kirkwood RN, Pertence AE, Fonseca ST.

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009 Nov-Dec;99(6):503-11.

PMID:
19917736
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The influence of footwear on foot motion during walking and running.

Morio C, Lake MJ, Gueguen N, Rao G, Baly L.

J Biomech. 2009 Sep 18;42(13):2081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.015. Epub 2009 Jul 29.

PMID:
19643421
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wegener C, Hunt AE, Vanwanseele B, Burns J, Smith RM.

J Foot Ankle Res. 2011 Jan 18;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-3.

PMID:
21244647
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
20.

The role of tibialis posterior fatigue on foot kinematics during walking.

Pohl MB, Rabbito M, Ferber R.

J Foot Ankle Res. 2010 Apr 20;3:6. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-6.

PMID:
20406465
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk