Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 131

1.

External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting.

Collins GS, de Groot JA, Dutton S, Omar O, Shanyinde M, Tajar A, Voysey M, Wharton R, Yu LM, Moons KG, Altman DG.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 19;14:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-40. Review.

2.

Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting.

Collins GS, Mallett S, Omar O, Yu LM.

BMC Med. 2011 Sep 8;9:103. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-103. Review.

3.

A systematic review finds prediction models for chronic kidney disease were poorly reported and often developed using inappropriate methods.

Collins GS, Omar O, Shanyinde M, Yu LM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;66(3):268-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Oct 30. Review.

PMID:
23116690
4.

Prediction of poor outcome in patients with acute liver failure-systematic review of prediction models.

Wlodzimirow KA, Eslami S, Chamuleau RA, Nieuwoudt M, Abu-Hanna A.

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050952. Epub 2012 Dec 14. Review.

5.

Reporting and Methodology of Multivariable Analyses in Prognostic Observational Studies Published in 4 Anesthesiology Journals: A Methodological Descriptive Review.

Guglielminotti J, Dechartres A, Mentré F, Montravers P, Longrois D, Laouénan C.

Anesth Analg. 2015 Oct;121(4):1011-29. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000517. Review.

PMID:
25390276
6.

A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models.

Debray TP, Vergouwe Y, Koffijberg H, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Moons KG.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;68(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Aug 30.

7.

Developing and validating risk prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Ahmed I, Debray TP, Moons KG, Riley RD.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jan 8;14:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-3. Review.

8.

Prediction models for successful external cephalic version: a systematic review.

Velzel J, de Hundt M, Mulder FM, Molkenboer JF, Van der Post JA, Mol BW, Kok M.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 24. Review.

PMID:
26546757
9.

A systematic review of breast cancer incidence risk prediction models with meta-analysis of their performance.

Meads C, Ahmed I, Riley RD.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Apr;132(2):365-77. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1818-2. Epub 2011 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
22037780
10.

Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review.

Bouwmeester W, Zuithoff NP, Mallett S, Geerlings MI, Vergouwe Y, Steyerberg EW, Altman DG, Moons KG.

PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):1-12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001221. Epub 2012 May 22. Review.

11.

Formal and informal prediction of recurrent stroke and myocardial infarction after stroke: a systematic review and evaluation of clinical prediction models in a new cohort.

Thompson DD, Murray GD, Dennis M, Sudlow CL, Whiteley WN.

BMC Med. 2014 Apr 4;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-58. Review.

12.

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review.

Damen JA, Hooft L, Schuit E, Debray TP, Collins GS, Tzoulaki I, Lassale CM, Siontis GC, Chiocchia V, Roberts C, Schlüssel MM, Gerry S, Black JA, Heus P, van der Schouw YT, Peelen LM, Moons KG.

BMJ. 2016 May 16;353:i2416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2416.

13.

Developing Risk Prediction Models for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: a Systematic Review of Methodology and Reporting Quality.

Wen Z, Guo Y, Xu B, Xiao K, Peng T, Peng M.

Indian J Surg. 2016 Apr;78(2):136-43. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1439-9. Epub 2016 Jan 23. Review.

PMID:
27303124
14.

Systematic review of risk prediction models for falls after stroke.

Walsh ME, Horgan NF, Walsh CD, Galvin R.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May;70(5):513-9. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206475. Epub 2016 Jan 14. Review.

PMID:
26767405
15.

Risk prediction models of breast cancer: a systematic review of model performances.

Anothaisintawee T, Teerawattananon Y, Wiratkapun C, Kasamesup V, Thakkinstian A.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 May;133(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1853-z. Epub 2011 Nov 11. Review.

PMID:
22076477
16.

Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.

Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Weeks L, Peters J, Kober T, Dias S, Schulz KF, Plint AC, Moher D.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2. Review.

PMID:
23152285
17.

Quality of first trimester risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review.

Brunelli VB, Prefumo F.

BJOG. 2015 Jun;122(7):904-14. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13334. Epub 2015 Mar 11. Review.

18.

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.

Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG; members of TRIPOD group.

Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1142-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

19.
20.

Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Williams C, Brunskill S, Altman D, Briggs A, Campbell H, Clarke M, Glanville J, Gray A, Harris A, Johnston K, Lodge M.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk