Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105


A questionnaire to assess the relevance and credibility of observational studies to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.

Berger ML, Martin BC, Husereau D, Worley K, Allen JD, Yang W, Quon NC, Mullins CD, Kahler KH, Crown W.

Value Health. 2014 Mar;17(2):143-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.12.011. Erratum in: Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):489.


Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.

Jansen JP, Trikalinos T, Cappelleri JC, Daw J, Andes S, Eldessouki R, Salanti G.

Value Health. 2014 Mar;17(2):157-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.004.


Questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility of modeling studies for informing health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.

Jaime Caro J, Eddy DM, Kan H, Kaltz C, Patel B, Eldessouki R, Briggs AH; ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Modeling CER Task Forces.

Value Health. 2014 Mar;17(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.003.


The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.

McGhan WF, Al M, Doshi JA, Kamae I, Marx SE, Rindress D.

Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.


Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: the ISPOR good research practices task force report.

Berger ML, Dreyer N, Anderson F, Towse A, Sedrakyan A, Normand SL.

Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):217-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.010.


Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, Revicki DA, Lenderking WR, Cella D, Basch E; ISPOR ePRO Task Force.

Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.


Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.

Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, Itzler R, Barrett A, Hawkins N, Lee K, Boersma C, Annemans L, Cappelleri JC.

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):417-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002.


Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.

Sullivan SD, Mauskopf JA, Augustovski F, Jaime Caro J, Lee KM, Minchin M, Orlewska E, Penna P, Rodriguez Barrios JM, Shau WY.

Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291. Epub 2013 Dec 13.


Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.

Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E; ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines-CHEERS Good Reporting Practices Task Force.

Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.


Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, Johnson FR, Mauskopf J.

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Apr 22.


Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force.

Matza LS, Patrick DL, Riley AW, Alexander JJ, Rajmil L, Pleil AM, Bullinger M.

Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):461-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.004.


Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.

Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, Turcotte S.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD006732.


Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.

Alemayehu D, Cappelleri JC.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;19(4):579-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01802.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.


Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Norris SL, Atkins D, Bruening W, Fox S, Johnson E, Kane R, Morton SC, Oremus M, Ospina M, Randhawa G, Schoelles K, Shekelle P, Viswanathan M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.027. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Erratum in: J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;66(10):1194.


Selecting a dynamic simulation modeling method for health care delivery research-part 2: report of the ISPOR Dynamic Simulation Modeling Emerging Good Practices Task Force.

Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, IJzerman MJ, Crown W, Padula WV, Wong PK, Pasupathy KS, Higashi MK, Osgood ND; ISPOR Emerging Good Practices Task Force.

Value Health. 2015 Mar;18(2):147-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.01.006. Review.


Tools for health care decision making: observational studies, modeling studies, and network meta-analyses.

Aronson N, Grant MD.

Value Health. 2014 Mar;17(2):141-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.02.001. No abstract available.


Review: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.

Goettsch WG, Enzing J.

Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 31. No abstract available.


Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.

Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Rawdin A, Johnson M, Kaltenthaler E, Paisley S, Papaioannou D, Shippam A.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250. Review.

Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk